E-commerce Contacto
/contact

Hawes, Endosonografía 4 edición

Robert H. Hawes


  1. Sección I: Bases de la ultrasonografía endoscópica
  2. Cap. 5 Nuevas técnicas en EUS: elastografía en tiempo real, EUS con administración de contraste y fusión de imagen.
Regresar

Capítulo 5 Nuevas técnicas en EUS: elastografía en tiempo real, EUS con administración de contraste y fusión de imagen.

  1. Săftoiu A. State-of-the-art imaging techniques in endoscopic ultrasound. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:691–696.
  2. Gheonea DI, Săftoiu A. Beyond conventional endoscopic ultrasound: elastography, contrast enhancement and hybrid techniques. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2011;27:423–429.
  3. Céspedes I, Ophir J, Ponnekanti H, Maklad N. Elastography: elasticity imaging using ultrasound with application to muscle and breast in vivo. Ultrason Imaging. 1993;15:73–88.
  4. Hiltawsky KM, Krüger M, Starke Cet al., et al. Freehand ultrasound elastography of breast lesions: clinical results. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2001;27(11):1461–1469.
  5. Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno Eet al., et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology. 2006;239:341–350.
  6. Ginat DT, Destounis SV, Barr RGet al., et al. US elastography of breast and prostate lesions. Radiographics. 2009;29:2007–2016.
  7. Cochlin DL, Ganatra RH, Griffiths DF. Elastography in the detection of prostatic cancer. Clin Radiol. 2002;57:1014–1020.
  8. König K, Scheipers U, Pesavento Aet al., et al. Initial experiences with real-time elastography guided biopsies of the prostate. J Urol. 2005;174:115–117.
  9. Pallwein L, Aigner F, Faschingbauer Ret al., et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis: value of real-time elastography. Abdom Imaging. 2008;33:729–735.
  10. Kapoor A, Kapoor A, Mahajan G, Sidhu BS. Real-time elastography in the detection of prostate cancer in patients with raised PSA level. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:1374–1381.
  11. Alam F, Naito K, Horiguchi Jet al., et al. Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:604–610.
  12. Tan R, Xiao Y, He Q. Ultrasound elastography: its potential role in assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:849–855.
  13. Bhatia KS, Cho CC, Yuen YHet al., et al. Real-time qualitative ultrasound elastography of cervical lymph nodes in routine clinical practice: interobserver agreement and correlation with malignancy. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010;36:1990–1997.
  14. Choi JJ, Kang BJ, Kim SHet al., et al. Role of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30:429–436.
  15. Taylor K, O’Keeffe S, Britton PDet al., et al. Ultrasound elastography as an adjuvant to conventional ultrasound in the preoperative assessment of axillary lymph nodes in suspected breast cancer: a pilot study. Clin Radiol. 2011;66(11):1064–1071.
  16. Park SH, Kim SJ, Kim EKet al., et al. Interobserver agreement in assessing the sonographic and elastographic features of malignant thyroid nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(5):W416–W423.
  17. Bojunga J, Herrmann E, Meyer Get al., et al. Real-time elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis. Thyroid. 2010;20:1145–1150.
  18. Ding J, Cheng HD, Huang Jet al., et al. An improved quantitative measurement for thyroid cancer detection based on elastography. Eur J Radiol. 2011;81(4):800–805.
  19. Xing P, Wu L, Zhang Cet al., et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant thyroid lesions: calculation of the strain ratio on thyroid sonoelastography. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30:663–669.
  20. Kapoor A, Kapoor A, Mahajan Get al., et al. Real-time elastography in differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic liver nodules. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:207–213.
  21. Gheonea DI, Săftoiu A, Ciurea Tet al., et al. Real-time sono-elastography in the diagnosis of diffuse liver diseases. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:1720–1726.
  22. Wang J, Guo L, Shi Xet al., et al. Real-time elastography with a novel quantitative technology for assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:e31–e36.
  23. Koizumi Y, Hirooka M, Kisaka Yet al., et al. Liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C: noninvasive diagnosis by means of real-time tissue elastography—establishment of the method for measurement. Radiology. 2011;258:610–617.
  24. Hirooka M, Koizumi Y, Hiasa Yet al., et al. Hepatic elasticity in patients with ascites: evaluation with real-time tissue elastography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W766–W771.
  25. Inoue Y, Takahashi M, Arita Jet al., et al. Intra-operative freehand real-time elastography for small focal liver lesions: “visual palpation” for non-palpable tumors. Surgery. 2010;148:1000–1011.
  26. Kato K, Sugimoto H, Kanazumi Net al., et al. Intra-operative application of real-time tissue elastography for the diagnosis of liver tumours. Liver Int. 2008;28(9):1264–1271.
  27. Waage JE, Havre RF, Odegaard Set al., et al. Endorectal elastography in the evaluation of rectal tumours. Colorectal Dis. 2010;13(10):1130–1137.
  28. Frey H. [Realtime elastography. A new ultrasound procedure for the reconstruction of tissue elasticity]. Radiologe. 2003;43:850–855.
  29. Săftoiu A, Vilmann P. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography—a new imaging technique for the visualization of tissue elasticity distribution. Journal Gastrointest Liv Dis. 2006;15:161–165.
  30. Dietrich CF, Săftoiu A, Jenssen C. Real time elastography endoscopic ultrasound (RTE-EUS), a comprehensive review. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(3):405–414.
  31. Bamber J, Cosgrove D, Dietrich CFet al., et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 1: basic principles and technology. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34:169–184.
  32. Cosgrove D, Piscaglia F, Bamber Jet al., et al. EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography. Part 2: clinical applications. Ultraschall Med. 2013;34:238–253.
  33. Havre RF, Waage JR, Gilja OHet al., et al. Real-time elastography: strain ratio measurements are influenced by the position of the reference area. Ultraschall Med. 2011. [Epub ahead of print].
  34. Săftoiu A, Vilmann P. Differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses by semiquantitative EUS elastography: between strain ratios and strain histograms. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:188–189.
  35. Giovannini M, Hookey LC, Bories Eet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography: the first step towards virtual biopsy? Preliminary results in 49 patients. Endoscopy. 2006;38:344–348.
  36. Giovannini M, Thomas B, Erwan Bet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of lymph nodes and pancreatic masses: a multicenter study. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:1587–1593.
  37. Larsen MH, Fristrup C, Hansen TPet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound, endoscopic sonoelastography, and strain ratio evaluation of lymph nodes with histology as gold standard. Endoscopy. 2012;44:759–766.
  38. Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Hassan H, Gorunescu F. Analysis of endoscopic ultrasound elastography used for characterisation and differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes. Ultraschall Med. 2006;27:535–542.
  39. Janssen J, Dietrich CF, Will U, Greiner L. Endosonographic elastography in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymph nodes. Endoscopy. 2007;39:952–957.
  40. Okasha HH, Mansour M, Attia KAet al., et al. Role of high resolution ultrasound/endosonography and elastography in predicting lymph node malignancy. Endosc Ultrasound. 2014;3(1):58–62.
  41. Sazuka T, Akai T, Uesato Met al., et al. Assessment for diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer using endoscopic ultrasound elastography. Esophagus. 2016;13:254–263.
  42. Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Ciurea Tet al., et al. Dynamic analysis of EUS used for the differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:291–300.
  43. Larsen MH, Fristrup CW, Mortensen MB. Intra- and interobserver agreement of endoscopic sonoelastography in the evaluation of lymph nodes. Ultraschall Med. 2011;32(suppl 2):E45–E50.
  44. Xu W, Shi J, Zeng Xet al., et al. EUS elastography for the differentiation of benign and malignant lymph nodes: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(5):1001–1009.
  45. Janssen J, Schlörer E, Greiner L. EUS elastography of the pancreas: feasibility and pattern description of the normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, and focal pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:971–978.
  46. Hirche TO, Ignee A, Barreiros APet al., et al. Indications and limitations of endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of focal pancreatic lesions. Endoscopy. 2008;40:910–917.
  47. Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu Fet al., et al. Neural network analysis of dynamic sequences of EUS elastography used for the differential diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:1086–1094.
  48. Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino-Noia J, Abdulkader Iet al., et al. EUS elastography for the characterization of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1101–1108.
  49. Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino-Noia J, Abdulkader Iet al., et al. Quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography: an accurate method for the differentiation of solid pancreatic masses. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1172–1180.
  50. Itokawa F, Itoi T, Sofuni Aet al., et al. EUS elastography combined with the strain ratio of tissue elasticity for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:843–853.
  51. Schrader H, Wiese M, Ellrichmann Met al., et al. Diagnostic value of quantitative EUS elastography for malignant pancreatic tumors: relationship with pancreatic fibrosis. Ultraschall Med. 2011;33(7):E196–E201.
  52. Săftoiu A, Iordache SA, Gheonea DIet al., et al. Combined contrast-enhanced power Doppler and real-time sonoelastography performed during EUS, used in the differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:739–747.
  53. Dawwas MF, Taha H, Leeds JSet al., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative EUS elastography for discriminating malignant from benign solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, single-center study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:953–961.
  54. Kongkam P, Lakananurak N, Navicharern Pet al., et al. Combination of EUS-FNA and elastography (strain ratio) to exclude malignant solid pancreatic lesions: a prospective single-blinded study. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30(11):1683–1689.
  55. Kim SY, Cho JH, Kim YJet al., et al. Diagnostic efficacy of quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography for differentiating pancreatic disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;32:1115–1122.
  56. Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu Fet al., et al. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound elastography used for differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses: a multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2011;43:596–603.
  57. Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Gorunescu Fet al., et al. European EUS Elastography Multicentric Study Group. Efficacy of an artificial neural network-based approach to endoscopic ultrasound elastography in diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(1):84–90.e1.
  58. Pei Q, Zou X, Zhang Xet al., et al. Diagnostic value of EUS elastography in differentiation of benign and malignant solid pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology. 2012;12:402–E408.
  59. Xu W, Shi J, Li Xet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for differentiation of benign and malignant pancreatic masses: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;25:218–224.
  60. Hu DM, Gong TT, Zhu Q. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for differential diagnosis of pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:1125–1131.
  61. Ying L, Lin X, Xie ZLet al., et al. Clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound elastography for identification of malignant pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:1434–1443.
  62. Iglesias-Garcia J, Domínguez-Muñoz JE, Castiñeira-Alvariño Met al., et al. Quantitative elastography associated with endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2013;45(10):781–788.
  63. Janssen J, Papavassiliou I. Effect of aging and diffuse chronic pancreatitis on pancreas elasticity evaluated using semiquantitative EUS elastography. Ultraschall Med. 2014;35(3):253–258.
  64. Dominguez-Muñoz JE, Iglesias-Garcia J, Castiñeira Alvariño Met al., et al. EUS elastography to predict pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(1):136–142.
  65. Rustemovic N, Hrstic I, Opacic Met al., et al. EUS elastography in the diagnosis of focal liver lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:823–824.
  66. Iglesias García J, Lariño Noia J, Souto Ret al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography of the liver. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2009;101:717–719.
  67. Gheorghe L, Gheorghe C, Cotruta B, Carabela A. CT aspects of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: adding EUS and EUS elastography to the diagnostic tools. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007;16:346–347.
  68. Kato K, Sugimoto H, Kanazumi Net al., et al. Intra-operative application of real-time tissue elastography for the diagnosis of liver tumours. Liver Int. 2008;28:1264–1271.
  69. Gheorghe L, Iacob S, Iacob Ret al., et al. Real time elastography—a non-invasive diagnostic method of small hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2009;18:439–446.
  70. Kapoor A, Kapoor A, Mahajan Get al., et al. Real-time elastography in differentiating metastatic from nonmetastatic liver nodules. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:207–213.
  71. Carrara S, Doglioni C, Arcidiacono PG, Testoni PA. Gastric metastasis from ovarian carcinoma diagnosed by EUS-FNA biopsy and elastography. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:223–225.
  72. Gheorghe L, Gheorghe C, Cotruta B, Carabela A. CT aspects of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: adding EUS and EUS elastography to the diagnostic tools. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2007;16:346–347.
  73. Săftoiu A, Gheonea DI. Tridimensional (3D) endoscopic ultrasound—a pictorial review. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2009;18:501–505.
  74. Reddy NK, Ioncică AM, Săftoiu Aet al., et al. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:42–48.
  75. Săftoiu A, Dietrich CF, Vilmann P. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound. Endoscopy. 2012;44:612–617.
  76. Piscaglia F, Nolsoe C, Dietrich CFet al., et al. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical practice of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS): update 2011 on non-hepatic applications. Ultraschall Med. 2012;33:33–59.
  77. Greis C, Dietrich CF. Ultrasound contrast agents and contrast enhanced sonography. In: Dietrich CF, ed. Endoscopic Ultrasound, an Introductory Manual and Atlas. 2nd ed. Thieme Verlag; 2011.
  78. Dietrich CF. Contrast-enhanced low mechanical index endoscopic ultrasound (CELMI-EUS). Endoscopy. 2009;41(suppl 2):E43–E44.
  79. Sanchez MVA, Varadarajulu S, Napoleon B. EUS contrast agents: what is available, how do they work, and are they effective? Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:S71–S77.
  80. Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht Tet al., et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS)—update 2008. Ultraschall Med. 2008;29:28–44.
  81. Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Frey H. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound with low mechanical index: a new technique. Z Gastroenterol. 2005;43:1219–1223.
  82. Kitano M, Takagi T, Sakamoto Het al., et al. Dynamic imaging of pancreatic tumors by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS with long-lasting contrast. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;67:141–150.
  83. Becker D, Strobel D, Bernatik T, Hahn EG. Echo-enhanced color- and power-Doppler EUS for the discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:784–789.
  84. Dietrich CF, Ignee A, Braden Bet al., et al. Improved differentiation of pancreatic tumors using contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:590–597, e1.
  85. Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Suetomi Yet al., et al. Utility of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography for diagnosis of small pancreatic carcinomas. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34:525–532.
  86. Hocke M, Schulze E, Gottschalk Pet al., et al. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:246–250.
  87. Săftoiu A, Iordache SA, Gheonea DIet al., et al. Combined contrast-enhanced power Doppler and real-time sonoelastography performed during EUS, used in the differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:739–747.
  88. Ishikawa T, Itoh A, Kawashima Het al., et al. Usefulness of EUS combined with contrast-enhancement in the differential diagnosis of malignant versus benign and preoperative localization of pancreatic endocrine tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:951–959.
  89. Hocke M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2011;43(2):163–165.
  90. Fusaroli P, Spada A, Mancino MG, Caletti G. Contrast harmonic echo-endoscopic ultrasound improves accuracy in diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:629–634.
  91. Napoleon B, Alvarez-Sanchez MV, Gincoul Ret al., et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound in solid lesions of the pancreas: results of a pilot study. Endoscopy. 2010;42:564–570.
  92. Seicean A, Badea R, Stan-Iuga Ret al., et al. Quantitative contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography for the discrimination of solid pancreatic masses. Ultraschall Med. 2010;31:571–576.
  93. Romagnuolo J, Hoffman B, Vela Set al., et al. Accuracy of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS with a second-generation perflutren lipid microsphere contrast agent (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:52–63.
  94. Matsubara H, Itoh A, Kawashima Het al., et al. Dynamic quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pancreatic diseases. Pancreas. 2011;40:1073–1079.
  95. Gheonea DI, Streba CT, Ciurea T, Săftoiu A. Quantitative low mechanical index contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of chronic pseudotumoral pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:2.
  96. Gauthier TP, Averkiou MA, Leen EL. Perfusion quantification using dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the impact of dynamic range and gain on time-intensity curves. Ultrasonics. 2011;51:102–106.
  97. Peronneau P, Lassau N, Leguerney Iet al., et al. Contrast ultrasonography: necessity of linear data processing for the quantification of tumor vascularization. Ultraschall Med. 2010;31:370–378.
  98. Gong TT, Hu DM, Zhu Q. Contrast-enhanced EUS for differential diagnosis of pancreatic mass lesions: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:301–309.
  99. D’Onofrio M, Biagioli E, Gerardi Cet al., et al. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (ECEUS) for the differentiation of pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultraschall Med. 2014;35(6):515–521.
  100. Gincul R, Palazzo M, Pujol Bet al., et al. Contrast-harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a prospective multicenter trial. Endoscopy. 2014;46(5):373–379.
  101. Park JS, Kim HK, Bang BWet al., et al. Effectiveness of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound for the evaluation of solid pancreatic masses. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(2):518–524.
  102. Săftoiu A, Vilmann P, Dietrich CFet al., et al. Quantitative contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS in differential diagnosis of focal pancreatic masses (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82(1):59–69.
  103. Dietrich CF, Sahai AV, D’Onofrio Met al., et al. Differential diagnosis of small solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84(6):933–940.
  104. Yamashita Y, Kato J, Ueda Ket al., et al. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography for pancreatic tumors. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:491782.
  105. Seicean A, Jinga M. Harmonic contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration: fact or fiction? Endosc Ultrasound. 2017;6(1):31–36.
  106. Hou X, Jin Z, Xu Cet al., et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: a retrospective study. PLoS One. 2015;10(3). e0121236.
  107. Seicean A, Badea R, Moldovan-Pop Aet al., et al. Harmonic contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography for the guidance of fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic masses. Ultraschall Med. 2017;38:174–182.
  108. Sugimoto M, Takagi T, Hikichi Tet al., et al. Conventional versus contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions: a prospective randomized trial. Pancreatology. 2015;15(5):538–541.
  109. Iordache S, Costache MI, Popescu CFet al., et al. Clinical impact of EUS elastography followed by contrast-enhanced EUS in patients with focal pancreatic masses and negative EUS-guided FNA. Med Ultrason. 2016;18(1):18–24.
  110. Ohno E, Hirooka Y, Itoh Aet al., et al. Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas: differentiation of malignant and benign tumors by endoscopic ultrasound findings of mural nodules. Ann Surg. 2009;249(4):628–634.
  111. Yamashita Y, Ueda K, Itonaga Met al., et al. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced endoscopic sonography for discriminating mural nodules from mucous clots in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms: a single-center prospective study. J Ultrasound Med. 2013;32(1):61–68.
  112. Harima H, Kaino S, Shinoda Set al., et al. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm using contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(20):6252–6260.
  113. Yamamoto N, Kato H, Tomoda Tet al., et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography with time-intensity curve analysis for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas. Endoscopy. 2016;48(1):26–34.
  114. Fusaroli P, Serrani M, De Giorgio Ret al., et al. Contrast harmonic-endoscopic ultrasound is useful to identify neoplastic features of pancreatic cysts (with videos). Pancreas. 2016;45(2):265–268.
  115. Nomura N, Goto H, Niwa Yet al., et al. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced EUS in the diagnosis of upper GI tract diseases. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:555–560.
  116. Iordache S, Filip MM, Georgescu CVet al., et al. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler endosonography and pathological assessment of vascularization in advanced gastric carcinomas—a feasibility study. Med Ultrason. 2012;14:101–107.
  117. Kannengiesser K, Mahlke R, Petersen Fet al., et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound is able to discriminate benign submucosal lesions from gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:1515–1520.
  118. Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Matsui Set al., et al. Estimation of malignant potential of GI stromal tumors by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:227–237.
  119. Yamashita Y, Kato J, Ueda Ket al., et al. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography can predict a higher malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors by visualizing large newly formed vessels. J Clin Ultrasound. 2015;43(2):89–97.
  120. Ignee A, Jenssen C, Hocke Met al., et al. Contrast-enhanced (endoscopic) ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound elastography in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Endosc Ultrasound. 2017;6(1):55–60.
  121. Xia Y, Kitano M, Kudo Met al., et al. Characterization of intra-abdominal lesions of undetermined origin by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:637–642.
  122. Paik WH, Choi JH, Seo DWet al., et al. Clinical usefulness with the combination of color Doppler and contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS for the assessment of visceral vascular diseases. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;48(10):845–850.
  123. Hocke M, Dietrich CF. New technology—combined use of 3D contrast enhanced endoscopic ultrasound techniques. Ultraschall Med. 2011;32:317–318.
  124. Matsui S, Kudo M, Kitano M, Asakuma Y. Evaluation of the response to chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS. Hepatogastroenterology. 2015;62(139):595–598.
  125. Yamashita Y, Ueda K, Itonaga Met al., et al. Tumor vessel depiction with contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography predicts efficacy of chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2013;42(6):990–995.
  126. Kruskal JB. Can contrast-enhanced US with targeted microbubbles monitor the response to antiangiogenic therapies? Radiology. 2008;246:339–340.
  127. Willmann JK, Paulmurugan R, Chen Ket al., et al. US imaging of tumor angiogenesis with microbubbles targeted to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor type 2 in mice. Radiology. 2008;246:508–518.
  128. Postema M, Gilja OH. Ultrasound-directed drug delivery. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2007;8:355–361.
  129. Estépar RS, Stylopoulos N, Ellis Ret al., et al. Towards scarless surgery: an endoscopic ultrasound navigation system for transgastric access procedures. Comput Aided Surg. 2007;12:311–324.
  130. Ewertsen C, Henriksen BM, Torp-Pedersen S, Bachmann Nielsen M. Characterization by biopsy or CEUS of liver lesions guided by image fusion between ultrasonography and CT, PET/CT or MRI. Ultraschall Med. 2011;32:191–197.
  131. Vosburgh KG, Stylopoulos N, Estepar RSet al., et al. EUS with CT improves efficiency and structure identification over conventional EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:866–870.
  132. Estépar RS, Westin CF, Vosburgh KG. Towards real time 2D to 3D registration for ultrasound-guided endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2009;4:549–560.
  133. Fernández-Esparrach G, Estépar SR, Guarner-Argente Cet al., et al. The role of a computed tomography-based image registered navigation system for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: a comparative study in a porcine model. Endoscopy. 2010;42:1096–1103.
  134. Obstein KL, Estépar RS, Jayender Jet al., et al. Image registered gastroscopic ultrasound (IRGUS) in human subjects: a pilot study to assess feasibility. Endoscopy. 2011;43:394–399.
  135. Ewertsen C, Săftoiu A, Gruionu LGet al., et al. Real-time image fusion involving diagnostic ultrasound. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200(3):W249–W255.
  136. Gruionu LG, Saftoiu A, Gruionu G. A novel fusion imaging system for endoscopic ultrasound. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016;5(1):35–42.
Regresar