E-commerce Contacto
/contact

Hawes, Endosonografía 4 edición

Robert H. Hawes


  1. Sección III: Estómago
  2. Cap. 11 Lesiones subepiteliales
Regresar

Capítulo 11 Lesiones subepiteliales.

  1. Hedenbro JL, Ekelund M, Wetterberg P. Endoscopic diagnosis of submucosal gastric lesions. The results after routine endoscopy. Surg Endosc. 1991;5:20–23.
  2. Caletti G, Zani L, Bolondi Let al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gastric submucosal tumor. Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;35:413–418.
  3. Yasuda K, Nakajima M, Yoshida Set al., et al. The diagnosis of submucosal tumors of the stomach by endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;35:10–15.
  4. Boyce GA, Sivak Jr. MV, Rosch Tet al., et al. Evaluation of submucosal upper gastrointestinal tract lesions by endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:449–454.
  5. Nesje LB, Laerum OD, Svanes Ket al., et al. Subepithelial masses of the gastrointestinal tract evaluated by endoscopic ultrasonography. Eur J Ultrasound. 2002;15:45–54.
  6. Van Stolk RU. Subepithelial lesions. In: Van Dam J, Sivak MV, eds. Gastrointestinal Endosonography. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1999:153–165.
  7. Chak A. EUS in submucosal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(suppl):S43–S48.
  8. Lim TW, Choi CW, Kang DHet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound without tissue acquisition has poor accuracy for diagnosing gastric subepithelial tumors. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95. e5246.
  9. Reddymasu SC, Oropeza-Vail M, Pakseresht Ket al., et al. Are endoscopic ultrasonography imaging characteristics reliable for the diagnosis of small upper gastrointestinal subepithelial lesions? J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:42–45.
  10. Karaca C, Turner BG, Cizginer Set al., et al. Accuracy of EUS in the evaluation of small gastric subepithelial lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:722–727.
  11. Ji F, Wang ZW, Wang LJet al., et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumors and diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:e318–e324.
  12. Kwon JG, Kim EY, Kim YSet al., et al. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonographic impression compared with pathologic diagnosis in gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2005;45:88–96.
  13. Kojima T, Takahashi H, Parra-Blanco Aet al., et al. Diagnosis of submucosal tumor of the upper GI tract by endoscopic resection. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:516–522.
  14. Matsui M, Goto H, Niwa Yet al., et al. Preliminary results of fine needle aspiration biopsy histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endoscopy. 1998;30:750–755.
  15. Polkowski M, Gerke W, Jarosz Det al., et al. Diagnostic yield and safety of endoscopic-ultrasound guided trucut biopsy in patients with gastric submucosal tumors: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2009;41:329–334.
  16. Chen VK, Eloubeidi MA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of intramural and extraintestinal mass lesions: diagnostic accuracy, complication assessment, and impact on management. Endoscopy. 2005;37:984–989.
  17. Shen EF, Arnott ID, Plevris Jet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of suspected upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumours. Br J Surg. 2002;89:231–235.
  18. Nickl NJ, Bhutani MS, Catalano Met al., et al. Clinical implications of endoscopic ultrasound: the American Endosonography Club Study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:371–377.
  19. Park YS, Park SW, Kim TIet al., et al. Endoscopic enucleation of upper-GI submucosal tumors by using an insulated-tip electrosurgical knife. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:409–415.
  20. Hoteya S, Iizuka T, Kikuchi D, Yahagi N. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric submucosal tumor, endoscopic sub-tumoral dissection. Dig Endoscopy. 2009;21:266–269.
  21. He G, Wang J, Chen Bet al., et al. Feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection for upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors treatment and value of endoscopic ultrasonography in pre-operation assess and post-operation follow-up: a prospective study of 224 cases in a single medical center. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:4206–4213.
  22. Rosch T, Lorenz R, Dancygier Het al., et al. Endosonographic diagnosis of submucosal upper gastrointestinal tract tumors. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1992;27:1–8.
  23. Futagami K, Hata J, Haruma Ket al., et al. Extracorporeal ultrasound is an effective diagnostic alternative to endoscopic ultrasound for gastric submucosal tumours. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2001;36:1222–1226.
  24. Goto O, Kambe H, Niimi Ket al., et al. Discrepancy in diagnosis of gastric submucosal tumor among esophagogastroduodenoscopy, CT, and endoscopic ultrasonography: a retrospective analysis of 93 consecutive cases. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37:1074–1078.
  25. Okten RS, Kacar S, Kucukay Fet al., et al. Gastric subepithelial masses: evaluation of multidetector CT (multiplanar reconstruction and virtual gastroscopy) versus endoscopic ultrasonography. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37:519–530.
  26. Rosch T, Kapfer B, Will Uet al., et al. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography in upper gastrointestinal submucosal lesions: a prospective multicenter study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2002;37:856–862.
  27. Motoo Y, Okai T, Ohta Het al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of extraluminal compressions mimicking gastric submucosal tumors. Endoscopy. 1994;26:239–242.
  28. Zhang QL, Nian WD. Endoscopic ultrasonography diagnosis in submucosal tumor of stomach. Endoscopy. 1998;30(suppl):A69–A71.
  29. Ra JC, Lee ES, Lee JBet al., et al. Diagnostic performance of stomach CT compared with endoscopic ultrasonography in diagnosing gastric subepithelial tumors. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2017;42:442–450.
  30. Polkowski M, Butruk E. Submucosal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2005;15:33–54. viii.
  31. Oztas E, Oguz D, Kurt Met al., et al. Endosonographic evaluation of patients with suspected extraluminal compression or subepithelial lesions during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23:586–592.
  32. Miettinen M, Sobin LH, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 1765 cases with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:52–68.
  33. Miettinen M, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Lasota J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: recent advances in understanding of their biology. Hum Pathol. 1999;30:1213–1220.
  34. Berman J, O’Leary TJ. Gastrointestinal stromal tumor workshop. Hum Pathol. 2001;32:578–582.
  35. Fletcher CD, Berman JJ, Corless Cet al., et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a consensus approach. Hum Pathol. 2002;33:459–465.
  36. Yoon JM, Kim GH, Park DYet al., et al. Endosonographic features of gastric schwannoma: a single center experience. Clin Endosc. 2016;49:548–554.
  37. Okai T, Minamoto T, Ohtsubo Ket al., et al. Endosonographic evaluation of c-kit-positive gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Abdom Imaging. 2003;28:301–307.
  38. Kim GH, Park DY, Kim Set al., et al. Is it possible to differentiate gastric GISTs from gastric leiomyomas by EUS? World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:3376–3381.
  39. Jeon SW, Park YD, Chung YJet al., et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: endosonographic differentiation in relation to histological risk. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:2069–2075.
  40. Shah P, Gao F, Edmundowicz SAet al., et al. Predicting malignant potential of gastrointestinal stromal tumors using endoscopic ultrasound. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:1265–1269.
  41. Onishi M, Tominaga K, Sugimori Set al., et al. Internal hypoechoic feature by EUS as a possible predictive marker for the enlargement potential of gastric GI stromal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:731–738.
  42. Chak A, Canto MI, Rosch Tet al., et al. Endosonographic differentiation of benign and malignant stromal cell tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;45:468–473.
  43. Palazzo L, Landi B, Cellier Cet al., et al. Endosonographic features predictive of benign and malignant gastrointestinal stromal cell tumours. Gut. 2000;46:88–92.
  44. Nickl N. Decision analysis of hypoechoic intramural tumor study results. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(suppl):S102.
  45. Kannengiesser K, Mahlke R, Petersen Fet al., et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasound is able to discriminate benign submucosal lesions from gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:1515–1520.
  46. Ignee A, Jenssen C, Hocke Met al., et al. Contrast-enhanced (endoscopic) ultrasound and endoscopic ultrasound elastography in gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Endosc Ultrasound. 2017;6:55–60.
  47. Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Matsui Set al., et al. Estimation of malignant potential of GI stromal tumors by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:227–237.
  48. Tsuji Y, Kusano C, Gotoda Tet al., et al. Diagnostic potential of endoscopic ultrasonography-elastography for gastric submucosal tumors: a pilot study. Dig Endosc. 2016;28:173–178.
  49. El Chafic AH, Loren D, Siddiqui Aet al., et al. Comparison of FNA and fine-needle biopsy for EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017. pii: S0016–5107(17)30027-5. [Epub ahead of print].
  50. DeWitt J, Emerson RE, Sherman Set al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy of gastrointestinal mesenchymal tumor. Surg Endosc. 2011;25:2192–2202.
  51. Watson RR, Binmoeller KF, Hamerski CMet al., et al. Yield and performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for diagnosing upper GI tract stromal tumors. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:1757–1762.
  52. Fernández-Esparrach G, Sendino O, Solé Met al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration and trucut biopsy in the diagnosis of gastric stromal tumors: a randomized crossover study. Endoscopy. 2010;42:292–299.
  53. Sepe PS, Moparty B, Pitman MBet al., et al. EUS-guided FNA for the diagnosis of GI stromal cell tumors: sensitivity and cytologic yield. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:254–261.
  54. Chatzipantelis P, Salla C, Karoumpalis Iet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach. A study of 17 cases. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2008;17:15–20.
  55. Akahoshi K, Sumida Y, Matsui Net al., et al. Preoperative diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumor by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:2077–2082.
  56. Mochizuki Y, Kodera Y, Fujiwara Met al., et al. Laparoscopic wedge resection for gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: initial experience. Surg Today. 2006;36:341–347.
  57. Okubo K, Yamao K, Nakamura Tet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the stomach. J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:747–753.
  58. Ando N, Goto H, Niwa Yet al., et al. The diagnosis of GI stromal tumors with EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with immunohistochemical analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:37–43.
  59. Armstrong CP, King PM, Dixon JMet al., et al. The clinical significance of heterotopic pancreas in the gastrointestinal tract. Br J Surg. 1981;68:384–387.
  60. Jovanovic I, Knezevic S, Micev Met al., et al. EUS mini probes in diagnosis of cystic dystrophy of duodenal wall in heterotopic pancreas: a case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:2609–2612.
  61. Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki Ket al., et al. Gastric aberrant pancreas: EUS analysis in comparison with the histology. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:493–497.
  62. Parmar JH, Lawrence R, Ridley NT. Submucous lipoma of the ileocaecal valve presenting as caecal volvulus. Int J Clin Pract. 2004;58:424–425.
  63. Watanabe F, Honda S, Kubota Het al., et al. Preoperative diagnosis of ileal lipoma by endoscopic ultrasonography probe. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2000;31:245–247.
  64. Zhou PH, Yao LQ, Zhong YSet al., et al. Role of endoscopic miniprobe ultrasonography in diagnosis of submucosal tumor of large intestine. World J Gastroenterol. 2004;10:2444–2446.
  65. Garcia M, Buitrago E, Bejarano PAet al., et al. Large esophageal liposarcoma: a case report and review of the literature. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2004;128:922–925.
  66. Nakamura S, Iida M, Yao Tet al., et al. Endoscopic features of gastric carcinoids. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:535–538.
  67. Ichikawa J, Tanabe S, Koizumi Wet al., et al. Endoscopic mucosal resection in the management of gastric carcinoid tumors. Endoscopy. 2003;35:203–206.
  68. Matsumoto T, Iida M, Suekane Het al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in rectal carcinoid tumors: contribution to selection of therapy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;37:539–542.
  69. Yasuda E, Tomita K, Nagura Yet al., et al. Endoscopic removal of granular cell tumor. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;41:163–167.
  70. Nakachi A, Miyazato H, Oshiro Tet al., et al. Granular cell tumor of the rectum: a case report and review of the literature. J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:631–634.
  71. Love MH, Glaser M, Edmunds SEet al., et al. Granular cell tumour of the oesophagus: endoscopic ultrasound appearances. Australas Radiol. 1999;43:253–255.
  72. Palazzo L, Landi B, Cellier Cet al., et al. Endosonographic features of esophageal granular cell tumors. Endoscopy. 1997;29:850–853.
  73. Kim DU, Kim GH, Ryu DYet al., et al. Endosonographic features of esophageal granular cell tumors using a high-frequency catheter probe. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:142–147.
  74. Hizawa K, Matsumoto T, Kouzuki Tet al., et al. Cystic submucosal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract: endosonographic findings and endoscopic removal. Endoscopy. 2000;32:712–714.
  75. Wildi SM, Hoda RS, Fickling Wet al., et al. Diagnosis of benign cysts of the mediastinum: the role and risks of EUS and FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:362–368.
  76. Fazel A, Moezardalan K, Varadarajulu Set al., et al. The utility and the safety of EUS-guided FNA in the evaluation of duplication cysts. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:575–580.
  77. Faigel DO, Burke A, Ginsberg GGet al., et al. The role of endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation and management of foregut duplications. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;45:99–103.
  78. Geller A, Wang KK, DiMagno EP. Diagnosis of foregut duplication cysts by endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastroenterology. 1995;109:838–842.
  79. Dancygier H, Lightdale CJ. Endoscopic ultrasonography of the upper gastrointestinal tract and colon. In: Stevens PD, ed. Endosonography in Gastroenterology: Principles, Techniques, Findings. New York: Thieme; 1999:76–89.
  80. Faigel DO, Rosen HR, Sasaki Aet al., et al. EUS in cirrhotic patients with and without prior variceal hemorrhage in comparison with noncirrhotic control subjects. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:455–462.
  81. Tio TL, Kimmings N, Rauws Eet al., et al. Endosonography of gastroesophageal varices: evaluation and follow-up of 76 cases. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:145–150.
  82. Lahoti S, Catalano MF, Alcocer Eet al., et al. Obliteration of esophageal varices using EUS-guided sclerotherapy with color Doppler. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:331–333.
  83. Binmoeller KF, Weilert F, Shah JN, Kim J. EUS-guided transesophageal treatment of gastric fundal varices with combined coiling and cyanoacrylate glue injection (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:1019–1025.
  84. Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki Ket al., et al. Endoscopic features of gastric inflammatory fibroid polyps. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:1595–1598.
  85. Matsushita M, Hajiro K, Okazaki Ket al., et al. Gastric inflammatory fibroid polyps: endoscopic ultrasonographic analysis in comparison with the histology. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;46:53–57.
  86. Imamura A, Tochihara M, Natsui Ket al., et al. Glomus tumor of the stomach: endoscopic ultrasonographic findings. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;89:271–272.
  87. Baek YH, Choi SR, Lee BE, Kim GH. Gastric glomus tumor: analysis of endosonographic characteristics and computed tomographic findings. Dig Endosc. 2013;25:80–83.
  88. Tang M, Hou J, Wu Det al., et al. Glomus tumor in the stomach: computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasound findings. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:1327–1329.
  89. Kim EY. Diagnosis of subepithelial lesion: still “tissue is the issue”. Clin Endosc. 2013;46:313–314.
  90. Ji JS, Lee BI, Choi KYet al., et al. Diagnostic yield of tissue sampling using a bite-on-bite technique for incidental subepithelial lesions. Korean J Intern Med. 2009;24:101–105.
  91. Buscaglia JM, Nagula S, Jayaraman Vet al., et al. Diagnostic yield and safety of jumbo biopsy forceps in patients with subepithelial lesions of the upper and lower GI tract. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:1147–1152.
  92. Kim EY. Introduction: value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Clin Endosc. 2012;45:115–116.
  93. Moon JS. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in submucosal lesion. Clin Endosc. 2012;45:117–123.
  94. Giovannini M, Seitz JF, Monges Get al., et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytology guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: results in 141 patients. Endoscopy. 1995;27:171–177.
  95. Eckardt AJ, Adler A, Gomes EMet al., et al. Endosonographic large-bore biopsy of gastric subepithelial tumors: a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24:1135–1144.
  96. Levy MJ, Jondal ML, Clain Jet al., et al. Preliminary experience with an EUS-guided Trucut biopsy needle compared with EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:101–106.
  97. Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz Net al., et al. Comparison of EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy. 2004;36:397–401.
  98. Săftoiu A, Vilmann P. Guldhammer Skov B, Georgescu CV. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided Trucut biopsy adds significant information to EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration in selected patients: a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:117–125.
  99. Kaffes AJ, Chen RY, Tam Wet al., et al. A prospective multicenter evaluation of a new side-port endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration in solid upper gastrointestinal lesions. Dig Endosc. 2012;24:448–451.
  100. DiMaio CJ, Kolb JM, Benias PCet al., et al. Initial experience with a novel EUS-guided core biopsy needle (SharkCore): results of a large North American multicenter study. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E974–E979.
  101. Nguyen-Tang T, Shah JN, Sanchez-Yague A, Binmoeller KF. Use of the front-view forward-array echoendoscope to evaluate right colonic subepithelial lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:606–610.
  102. Matsuzaki I, Miyahara R, Hirooka Yet al., et al. Forward-viewing versus oblique-viewing echoendoscopes in the diagnosis of upper GI subepithelial lesions with EUS-guided FNA: a prospective, randomized, crossover study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82:287–295.
  103. Schlag C, Menzel Cet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue sampling of small subepithelial tumors of the upper gastrointestinal tract with a 22-gauge core biopsy needle. Endosc Int Open. 2017;5:E165–E171.
  104. Lee JH, Cho CJ, Park YSet al., et al. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine needle biopsy for the diagnosis of gastric subepithelial tumors larger than 2 cm. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51:486–493.
  105. Na HK, Lee JH, Park YSet al., et al. Yields and utility of endoscopic ultrasonography-quided 19-gauge Trucut biopsy versus 22-gauge fine needle aspiration for diagnosing gastric subepithelial tumors. Clin Endosc. 2015;48:152–157.
  106. Kim GH, Cho YK, Kim EYet al., et al. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:347–354.
  107. Çağlar E, Hatemi İ, Atasoy Det al., et al. Concordance of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration diagnosis with the final diagnosis in subepithelial lesions. Clin Endosc. 2013;46:379–383.
  108. Rong L, Kida M, Yamauchi Het al., et al. Factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid mass lesions. Dig Endosc. 2012;24:358–363.
  109. Suzuki T, Arai M, Matsumura Tet al., et al. Factors associated with inadequate tissue yield in EUS-FNA for gastric SMT. ISRN Gastroenterol. 2011;2011:619128.
  110. Mekky MA, Yamao K, Sawaki Aet al., et al. Diagnostic utility of EUS-guided FNA in patients with gastric submucosal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:913–919.
  111. Hoda KM, Rodriguez SA, Faigel DO. EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1218–1223.
  112. Vander Noot 3rd MR, Eloubeidi MA, Chen VKet al., et al. Diagnosis of gastrointestinal tract lesions by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer. 2004;102:157–163.
  113. Kim EY. How can we obtain tissue from a subepithelial lesion for pathologic diagnosis? Clin Endosc. 2017;50:6–7.
  114. Hwang JH, Rulyak SD, Kimmey MB. American Gastroenterological Association Institute technical review on the management of gastric subepithelial masses. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:2217–2228.

 

Capítulo 13

Ultrasonido endoscópico en enfermedades inflamatorias del páncreas

  1. Rajan E, Clain JE, Levy MJet al., et al. Age-related changes in the pancreas identified by EUS: a prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:401–406.
  2. Savides TJ, Gress FG, Zaidi SAet al., et al. Detection of embryologic ventral pancreatic parenchyma with endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:14–19.
  3. Petrone MC, Arcidiacono PG, Perri Fet al., et al. Chronic pancreatitis-like changes detected by endoscopic ultrasound in subjects without signs of pancreatic disease: do these indicate age-related changes, effects of xenobiotics, or early chronic pancreatitis? Pancreatology. 2010;10:597–602.
  4. Wiersema MJ, Hawes RH, Lehman GAet al., et al. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with chronic abdominal pain of suspected pancreatic origin. Endoscopy. 1993;25:555–564.
  5. Majumder S, Chari ST. Chronic pancreatitis. Lancet. 2016;387:1957–1966.
  6. Campisi A, Brancatelli G, Vullierme MPet al., et al. Are pancreatic calcifications specific for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis? A multidetector-row CT analysis. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:903–911.
  7. Luetmer PH, Stephens DH, Ward EM. Chronic pancreatitis: reassessment with current CT. Radiology. 1989;171:353–357.
  8. Conwell DL, Lee LS, Yadav Det al., et al. American pancreatic association practice guidelines in chronic pancreatitis: evidence-based report on diagnostic guidelines. Pancreas. 2014;43:1143–1162.
  9. Varadarajulu S, Eltoum I, Tamhane Aet al., et al. Histopathologic correlates of noncalcific chronic pancreatitis by EUS: a prospective tissue characterization study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:501–509.
  10. Catalano MF, Sahai A, Levy Met al., et al. EUS-based criteria for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: the rosemont classification. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1251–1261.
  11. D’Souza SL, Anderson MA, Korsnes SJet al., et al. EUS diagnostic criteria for chronic pancreatitis: a comparison of conventional versus rosemont criteria. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:3782–3787.
  12. Trikudanathan G, Vega-Peralta J, Malli Aet al., et al. Diagnostic Performance of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) for Non-Calcific Chronic Pancreatitis (NCCP) based on histopathology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:568–574.
  13. Albashir S, Bronner MP, Parsi MAet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound, secretin endoscopic pancreatic function test, and histology: correlation in chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2498–2503.
  14. LeBlanc JK, Chen JH, Al-Haddad Met al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and histology in chronic pancreatitis: how are they associated? Pancreas. 2014;43:440–444.
  15. Wallace MB, Hawes RH, Durkalski Vet al., et al. The reliability of EUS for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: interobserver agreement among experienced endosonographers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:294–299.
  16. Gardner TB, Gordon SR. Interobserver agreement for pancreatic endoscopic ultrasonography determined by same day back-to-back examinations. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:542–545.
  17. Stevens T, Lopez R, Adler DGet al., et al. Multicenter comparison of the interobserver agreement of standard EUS scoring and rosemont classification scoring for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:519–526.
  18. Kalmin B, Hoffman B, Hawes Ret al., et al. Conventional versus rosemont endoscopic ultrasound criteria for chronic pancreatitis: comparing interobserver reliability and intertest agreement. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011;25:261–264.
  19. Del Pozo D, Poves E, Tabernero Set al., et al. Conventional versus rosemont endoscopic ultrasound criteria for chronic pancreatitis: interobserver agreement in same day back-to-back procedures. Pancreatology. 2012;12:284–287.
  20. Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P, Cavallini Get al., et al. Pancreatitis and the risk of pancreatic cancer. International Pancreatitis Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1433–1437.
  21. Ardengh JC, Lopes CV, Campos ADet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and fine needle aspiration in chronic pancreatitis: differential diagnosis between pseudotumoral masses and pancreatic cancer. JOP. 2007;8:413–421.
  22. Fritscher-Ravens A, Brand L, Knofel WTet al., et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for focal pancreatic lesions in patients with normal parenchyma and chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2768–2775.
  23. Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Eloubeidi MA. Yield of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses in the presence or the absence of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:728–736. quiz 751, 753.
  24. Giovannini M, Hookey LC, Bories Eet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography: the first step towards virtual biopsy? Preliminary results in 49 patients. Endoscopy. 2006;38:344–348.
  25. Kuwahara T, Hirooka Y, Kawashima Het al., et al. Quantitative diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis using EUS elastography. J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:868–874.
  26. Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Castineira-Alvarino Met al., et al. Quantitative elastography associated with endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2013;45:781–788.
  27. Dominguez-Munoz JE, Iglesias-Garcia J, Castineira Alvarino Met al., et al. EUS elastography to predict pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:136–142.
  28. Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt Jet al., et al. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1400–1415. 1416.
  29. Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, Anderson MAet al., et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:1–9.
  30. Sharma R, Menachery J, Choudhary NSet al., et al. Routine endoscopic ultrasound in moderate and indeterminate risk patients of suspected choledocholithiasis to avoid unwarranted ERCP: a prospective randomized blinded study. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2015;34:300–304.
  31. De Lisi S, Leandro G, Buscarini E. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23:367–374.
  32. Park JG, Kim KB, Han JHet al., et al. The usefulness of early endoscopic ultrasonography in acute biliary pancreatitis with undetectable choledocholithiasis on multidetector computed tomography. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2016;68:202–209.
  33. Zhan X, Guo X, Chen Yet al., et al. EUS in exploring the etiology of mild acute biliary pancreatitis with a negative finding of biliary origin by conventional radiological methods. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:1500–1503.
  34. Vila JJ, Vicuna M, Irisarri Ret al., et al. Diagnostic yield and reliability of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:375–381.
  35. Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Rao Cet al., et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in idiopathic acute pancreatitis with negative ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Ann Gastroenterol. 2012;25:133–137.
  36. Govil A, Agrawal MK, Agrawal Det al., et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with first episode of idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2014;33:241–248.
  37. Wilcox CM, Seay T, Kim Het al., et al. Prospective endoscopic ultrasound-based approach to the evaluation of idiopathic pancreatitis: causes, response to therapy, and long-term outcome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:1339–1348.
  38. Ortega AR, Gomez-Rodriguez R, Romero Met al., et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the etiological diagnosis of “idiopathic” acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2011;40:289–294.
  39. Thevenot A, Bournet B, Otal Pet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:2361–2368.
  40. Munigala S, Kanwal F, Xian Het al., et al. Increased risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma after acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1143–1150.e1.
  41. Mariani A, Arcidiacono PG, Curioni Set al., et al. Diagnostic yield of ERCP and secretin-enhanced MRCP and EUS in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis of unknown aetiology. Dig Liver Dis. 2009;41:753–758.
  42. Yusoff IF, Raymond G, Sahai AV. A prospective comparison of the yield of EUS in primary vs. recurrent idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:673–678.
  43. Cho JH, Jeon TJ, Choi JSet al., et al. EUS finding of geographic hyperechoic area is an early predictor for severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2012;12:495–501.
  44. Alper E, Arabul M, Aslan Fet al., et al. Radial EUS examination can be helpful in predicting the severity of acute biliary pancreatitis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95. e2321.
  45. Sotoudehmanesh R, Hooshyar A, Kolahdoozan Set al., et al. Prognostic value of endoscopic ultrasound in acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2010;10:702–706.
  46. Shimosegawa T, Chari ST, Frulloni Let al., et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis: guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology. Pancreas. 2011;40:352–358.
  47. Kamisawa T, Egawa N, Nakajima Het al., et al. Clinical difficulties in the differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2694–2699.
  48. Chari ST, Smyrk TC, Levy MJet al., et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis: the mayo clinic experience. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1010–1016. quiz 934.
  49. Levy MJ, Reddy RP, Wiersema MJet al., et al. EUS-guided trucut biopsy in establishing autoimmune pancreatitis as the cause of obstructive jaundice. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:467–472.
  50. Levy MJ, Smyrk TC, Takahashi Net al., et al. Idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis: disease description and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided trucut biopsy diagnosis. Pancreatology. 2011;11:76–80.
  51. Farrell JJ, Garber J, Sahani Det al., et al. EUS findings in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:927–936.
  52. De Lisi S, Buscarini E, Arcidiacono PGet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography findings in autoimmune pancreatitis: be aware of the ambiguous features and look for the pivotal ones. JOP. 2010;11:78–84.
  53. Buscarini E, Lisi SD, Arcidiacono PGet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography findings in autoimmune pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:2080–2085.
  54. Okabe Y, Ishida Y, Kaji Ret al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonographic study of autoimmune pancreatitis and the effect of steroid therapy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:266–273.
  55. Koyama R, Imamura T, Okuda Cet al., et al. Ultrasonographic imaging of bile duct lesions in autoimmune pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2008;37:259–264.
  56. Hoki N, Mizuno N, Sawaki Aet al., et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasonography. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:154–159.
  57. Jung JG, Lee JK, Lee KHet al., et al. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with papillary biopsy and endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic biopsy in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2015;15:259–264.
  58. Kanno A, Masamune A, Fujishima Fet al., et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-guided FNA using a 22-gauge needle: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:797–804.e1.
  59. Morishima T, Kawashima H, Ohno Eet al., et al. Prospective multicenter study on the usefulness of EUS-guided FNA biopsy for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:241–248.
  60. Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Doi Set al., et al. Use of samples from endoscopic ultrasound-guided 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:316–322.
  61. Deshpande V, Mino-Kenudson M, Brugge WRet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of autoimmune pancreatitis: diagnostic criteria and pitfalls. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1464–1471.
  62. Mizuno N, Bhatia V, Hosoda Wet al., et al. Histological diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using EUS-guided trucut biopsy: a comparison study with EUS-FNA. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:742–750.
  63. Chari ST, Kloeppel G, Zhang Let al., et al. Histopathologic and clinical subtypes of autoimmune pancreatitis: the honolulu consensus document. Pancreas. 2010;39:549–554.
  64. Kanno A, Ishida K, Hamada Set al., et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-FNA by using a 22-gauge needle based on the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:594–602.
  65. Moon SH, Kim MH. The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:645–656.
  66. Naitoh I, Nakazawa T, Hayashi Ket al., et al. Clinical differences between mass-forming autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:607–613.
  67. Takuma K, Kamisawa T, Gopalakrishna Ret al., et al. Strategy to differentiate autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreas cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:1015–1020.
  68. Voss M, Hammel P, Molas Get al., et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Gut. 2000;46:244–249.
  69. Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a learning curve with 300 consecutive procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:700–708.
  70. Mitsuhashi T, Ghafari S, Chang CYet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas: cytomorphological evaluation with emphasis on adequacy assessment, diagnostic criteria and contamination from the gastrointestinal tract. Cytopathology. 2006;17:34–41.
  71. Turner BG, Cizginer S, Agarwal Det al., et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasia with EUS and FNA: a report of accuracy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:91–98.
  72. Chen J, Yang R, Lu Yet al., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesion: a systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012;138:1433–1441.
  73. Fujii LL, Chari ST, El-Youssef Met al., et al. Pediatric pancreatic EUS-guided trucut biopsy for evaluation of autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:824–828.
  74. Kerdsirichairat T, Saini SD, Chamberlain PRet al., et al. Autoimmune pancreatitis diagnosed with core biopsy obtained from a novel fork-tip EUS needle. ACG Case Rep J. 2017;4. e7.
  75. Dietrich CF, Hirche TO, Ott Met al., et al. Real-time tissue elastography in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2009;41:718–720.
  76. Fusaroli P, Saftoiu A, Mancino MGet al., et al. Techniques of image enhancement in EUS (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:645–655.
  77. Hocke M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2011;43:163–165.
  78. Imazu H, Kanazawa K, Mori Net al., et al. Novel quantitative perfusion analysis with contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS for differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:853–860.
  79. Fujii M, Saito H, Kato Het al., et al. Diagnosis of a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm using EUS-FNA. Intern Med. 2013;52:1703–1708.
  80. Maimone A, Luigiano C, Baccarini Pet al., et al. Preoperative diagnosis of a solid pseudopapillary tumour of the pancreas by endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy: a retrospective case series. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:957–960.
  81. Yamaguchi M, Fukuda T, Nakahara Met al., et al. Multicentric solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: a case report. Surg Case Rep. 2015;1:110.
  82. Goyal A, Jain D, Bhat Iet al., et al. A unique case of pancreatic mass due to pancreatic elastofibromatosis. Case Rep Gastrointest Med. 2016;2016:2697187.
  83. Collins K, Buckley T, Anderson Ket al., et al. Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) of pancreas diagnosed preoperatively by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: a case report and review of literature. Diagn Cytopathol. 2017;45:59–65.
  84. Mondal U, Henkes N, Henkes Det al., et al. Cavernous hemangioma of adult pancreas: a case report and literature review. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:9793–9802.
  85. Vafa H, Arvanitakis M, Matos Cet al., et al. Pancreatic tuberculosis diagnosed by EUS: one disease, many faces. JOP. 2013;14:256–260.
  86. Maestro S, Trujillo R, Geneux Ket al., et al. Pancreatic actinomycosis presenting as pancreatic mass and diagnosed with endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Endoscopy. 2013:45. Suppl 2 UCTN:E276–E277.
  87. Sun B, Yang X, Ping Bet al., et al. Impact of inconclusive endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration results in the management and outcome of patients with solid pancreatic masses. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:130–136.
  88. Hebert-Magee S, Bae S, Varadarajulu Set al., et al. The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Cytopathology. 2013;24:159–171.
  89. Rodriguez SA, Impey SD, Pelz Cet al., et al. RNA sequencing distinguishes benign from malignant pancreatic lesions sampled by EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:252–258.
  90. Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Endoscopy. 2016;48:339–349.
  91. Strand DS, Jeffus SK, Sauer BGet al., et al. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms. Diagn Cytopathol. 2014;42:751–758.
  92. Ying L, Lin X, Xie ZLet al., et al. Clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound elastography for identification of malignant pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:1434–1443.
  93. Itokawa F, Itoi T, Sofuni Aet al., et al. EUS elastography combined with the strain ratio of tissue elasticity for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:843–853.
  94. Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino-Noia J, Abdulkader Iet al., et al. EUS elastography for the characterization of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1101–1108.
  95. Kim SY, Cho JH, Kim YJet al., et al. Diagnostic efficacy of quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography for differentiating pancreatic disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016.
  96. Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino-Noia J, Abdulkader Iet al., et al. Quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography: an accurate method for the differentiation of solid pancreatic masses. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1172–1180.
  97. Dawwas MF, Taha H, Leeds JSet al., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative EUS elastography for discriminating malignant from benign solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, single-center study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:953–961.
  98. Hocke M, Schulze E, Gottschalk Pet al., et al. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:246–250.
  99. Gheonea DI, Streba CT, Ciurea Tet al., et al. Quantitative low mechanical index contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of chronic pseudotumoral pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:2.
  100. Hocke M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. Advanced endosonographic diagnostic tools for discrimination of focal chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma—elastography, contrast enhanced high mechanical index (CEHMI) and low mechanical index (CELMI) endosonography in direct comparison. Z Gastroenterol. 2012;50:199–203.
  101. Becker D, Strobel D, Bernatik Tet al., et al. Echo-enhanced color- and power-doppler EUS for the discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:784–789.
Regresar