E-commerce Contacto
/contact

Hawes, Endosonografía 4 edición

Robert H. Hawes


  1. Sección IV: Páncreas y árbol biliar
  2. Cap. 13 Ultrasonido endoscópico en enfermedades inflamatorias del páncreas
Regresar

Capítulo 13 Ultrasonido endoscópico en enfermedades inflamatorias del páncreas.

  1. Rajan E, Clain JE, Levy MJet al., et al. Age-related changes in the pancreas identified by EUS: a prospective evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:401–406.
  2. Savides TJ, Gress FG, Zaidi SAet al., et al. Detection of embryologic ventral pancreatic parenchyma with endoscopic ultrasound. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;43:14–19.
  3. Petrone MC, Arcidiacono PG, Perri Fet al., et al. Chronic pancreatitis-like changes detected by endoscopic ultrasound in subjects without signs of pancreatic disease: do these indicate age-related changes, effects of xenobiotics, or early chronic pancreatitis? Pancreatology. 2010;10:597–602.
  4. Wiersema MJ, Hawes RH, Lehman GAet al., et al. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with chronic abdominal pain of suspected pancreatic origin. Endoscopy. 1993;25:555–564.
  5. Majumder S, Chari ST. Chronic pancreatitis. Lancet. 2016;387:1957–1966.
  6. Campisi A, Brancatelli G, Vullierme MPet al., et al. Are pancreatic calcifications specific for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis? A multidetector-row CT analysis. Clin Radiol. 2009;64:903–911.
  7. Luetmer PH, Stephens DH, Ward EM. Chronic pancreatitis: reassessment with current CT. Radiology. 1989;171:353–357.
  8. Conwell DL, Lee LS, Yadav Det al., et al. American pancreatic association practice guidelines in chronic pancreatitis: evidence-based report on diagnostic guidelines. Pancreas. 2014;43:1143–1162.
  9. Varadarajulu S, Eltoum I, Tamhane Aet al., et al. Histopathologic correlates of noncalcific chronic pancreatitis by EUS: a prospective tissue characterization study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:501–509.
  10. Catalano MF, Sahai A, Levy Met al., et al. EUS-based criteria for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: the rosemont classification. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1251–1261.
  11. D’Souza SL, Anderson MA, Korsnes SJet al., et al. EUS diagnostic criteria for chronic pancreatitis: a comparison of conventional versus rosemont criteria. Dig Dis Sci. 2015;60:3782–3787.
  12. Trikudanathan G, Vega-Peralta J, Malli Aet al., et al. Diagnostic Performance of Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS) for Non-Calcific Chronic Pancreatitis (NCCP) based on histopathology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:568–574.
  13. Albashir S, Bronner MP, Parsi MAet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound, secretin endoscopic pancreatic function test, and histology: correlation in chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105:2498–2503.
  14. LeBlanc JK, Chen JH, Al-Haddad Met al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and histology in chronic pancreatitis: how are they associated? Pancreas. 2014;43:440–444.
  15. Wallace MB, Hawes RH, Durkalski Vet al., et al. The reliability of EUS for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: interobserver agreement among experienced endosonographers. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:294–299.
  16. Gardner TB, Gordon SR. Interobserver agreement for pancreatic endoscopic ultrasonography determined by same day back-to-back examinations. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2011;45:542–545.
  17. Stevens T, Lopez R, Adler DGet al., et al. Multicenter comparison of the interobserver agreement of standard EUS scoring and rosemont classification scoring for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:519–526.
  18. Kalmin B, Hoffman B, Hawes Ret al., et al. Conventional versus rosemont endoscopic ultrasound criteria for chronic pancreatitis: comparing interobserver reliability and intertest agreement. Can J Gastroenterol. 2011;25:261–264.
  19. Del Pozo D, Poves E, Tabernero Set al., et al. Conventional versus rosemont endoscopic ultrasound criteria for chronic pancreatitis: interobserver agreement in same day back-to-back procedures. Pancreatology. 2012;12:284–287.
  20. Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P, Cavallini Get al., et al. Pancreatitis and the risk of pancreatic cancer. International Pancreatitis Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1433–1437.
  21. Ardengh JC, Lopes CV, Campos ADet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and fine needle aspiration in chronic pancreatitis: differential diagnosis between pseudotumoral masses and pancreatic cancer. JOP. 2007;8:413–421.
  22. Fritscher-Ravens A, Brand L, Knofel WTet al., et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for focal pancreatic lesions in patients with normal parenchyma and chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2768–2775.
  23. Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Eloubeidi MA. Yield of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses in the presence or the absence of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:728–736. quiz 751, 753.
  24. Giovannini M, Hookey LC, Bories Eet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography: the first step towards virtual biopsy? Preliminary results in 49 patients. Endoscopy. 2006;38:344–348.
  25. Kuwahara T, Hirooka Y, Kawashima Het al., et al. Quantitative diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis using EUS elastography. J Gastroenterol. 2017;52:868–874.
  26. Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Castineira-Alvarino Met al., et al. Quantitative elastography associated with endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2013;45:781–788.
  27. Dominguez-Munoz JE, Iglesias-Garcia J, Castineira Alvarino Met al., et al. EUS elastography to predict pancreatic exocrine insufficiency in patients with chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:136–142.
  28. Tenner S, Baillie J, DeWitt Jet al., et al. American College of Gastroenterology guideline: management of acute pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1400–1415. 1416.
  29. Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T, Anderson MAet al., et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:1–9.
  30. Sharma R, Menachery J, Choudhary NSet al., et al. Routine endoscopic ultrasound in moderate and indeterminate risk patients of suspected choledocholithiasis to avoid unwarranted ERCP: a prospective randomized blinded study. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2015;34:300–304.
  31. De Lisi S, Leandro G, Buscarini E. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in acute biliary pancreatitis: a systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;23:367–374.
  32. Park JG, Kim KB, Han JHet al., et al. The usefulness of early endoscopic ultrasonography in acute biliary pancreatitis with undetectable choledocholithiasis on multidetector computed tomography. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2016;68:202–209.
  33. Zhan X, Guo X, Chen Yet al., et al. EUS in exploring the etiology of mild acute biliary pancreatitis with a negative finding of biliary origin by conventional radiological methods. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;26:1500–1503.
  34. Vila JJ, Vicuna M, Irisarri Ret al., et al. Diagnostic yield and reliability of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:375–381.
  35. Rana SS, Bhasin DK, Rao Cet al., et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasound in idiopathic acute pancreatitis with negative ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Ann Gastroenterol. 2012;25:133–137.
  36. Govil A, Agrawal MK, Agrawal Det al., et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with first episode of idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2014;33:241–248.
  37. Wilcox CM, Seay T, Kim Het al., et al. Prospective endoscopic ultrasound-based approach to the evaluation of idiopathic pancreatitis: causes, response to therapy, and long-term outcome. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111:1339–1348.
  38. Ortega AR, Gomez-Rodriguez R, Romero Met al., et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the etiological diagnosis of “idiopathic” acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2011;40:289–294.
  39. Thevenot A, Bournet B, Otal Pet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in patients with idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58:2361–2368.
  40. Munigala S, Kanwal F, Xian Het al., et al. Increased risk of pancreatic adenocarcinoma after acute pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12:1143–1150.e1.
  41. Mariani A, Arcidiacono PG, Curioni Set al., et al. Diagnostic yield of ERCP and secretin-enhanced MRCP and EUS in patients with acute recurrent pancreatitis of unknown aetiology. Dig Liver Dis. 2009;41:753–758.
  42. Yusoff IF, Raymond G, Sahai AV. A prospective comparison of the yield of EUS in primary vs. recurrent idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:673–678.
  43. Cho JH, Jeon TJ, Choi JSet al., et al. EUS finding of geographic hyperechoic area is an early predictor for severe acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2012;12:495–501.
  44. Alper E, Arabul M, Aslan Fet al., et al. Radial EUS examination can be helpful in predicting the severity of acute biliary pancreatitis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95. e2321.
  45. Sotoudehmanesh R, Hooshyar A, Kolahdoozan Set al., et al. Prognostic value of endoscopic ultrasound in acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2010;10:702–706.
  46. Shimosegawa T, Chari ST, Frulloni Let al., et al. International consensus diagnostic criteria for autoimmune pancreatitis: guidelines of the International Association of Pancreatology. Pancreas. 2011;40:352–358.
  47. Kamisawa T, Egawa N, Nakajima Het al., et al. Clinical difficulties in the differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2694–2699.
  48. Chari ST, Smyrk TC, Levy MJet al., et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis: the mayo clinic experience. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1010–1016. quiz 934.
  49. Levy MJ, Reddy RP, Wiersema MJet al., et al. EUS-guided trucut biopsy in establishing autoimmune pancreatitis as the cause of obstructive jaundice. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:467–472.
  50. Levy MJ, Smyrk TC, Takahashi Net al., et al. Idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis: disease description and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided trucut biopsy diagnosis. Pancreatology. 2011;11:76–80.
  51. Farrell JJ, Garber J, Sahani Det al., et al. EUS findings in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:927–936.
  52. De Lisi S, Buscarini E, Arcidiacono PGet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography findings in autoimmune pancreatitis: be aware of the ambiguous features and look for the pivotal ones. JOP. 2010;11:78–84.
  53. Buscarini E, Lisi SD, Arcidiacono PGet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography findings in autoimmune pancreatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:2080–2085.
  54. Okabe Y, Ishida Y, Kaji Ret al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonographic study of autoimmune pancreatitis and the effect of steroid therapy. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:266–273.
  55. Koyama R, Imamura T, Okuda Cet al., et al. Ultrasonographic imaging of bile duct lesions in autoimmune pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2008;37:259–264.
  56. Hoki N, Mizuno N, Sawaki Aet al., et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using endoscopic ultrasonography. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:154–159.
  57. Jung JG, Lee JK, Lee KHet al., et al. Comparison of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with papillary biopsy and endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic biopsy in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2015;15:259–264.
  58. Kanno A, Masamune A, Fujishima Fet al., et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-guided FNA using a 22-gauge needle: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:797–804.e1.
  59. Morishima T, Kawashima H, Ohno Eet al., et al. Prospective multicenter study on the usefulness of EUS-guided FNA biopsy for the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:241–248.
  60. Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Doi Set al., et al. Use of samples from endoscopic ultrasound-guided 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:316–322.
  61. Deshpande V, Mino-Kenudson M, Brugge WRet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of autoimmune pancreatitis: diagnostic criteria and pitfalls. Am J Surg Pathol. 2005;29:1464–1471.
  62. Mizuno N, Bhatia V, Hosoda Wet al., et al. Histological diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis using EUS-guided trucut biopsy: a comparison study with EUS-FNA. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:742–750.
  63. Chari ST, Kloeppel G, Zhang Let al., et al. Histopathologic and clinical subtypes of autoimmune pancreatitis: the honolulu consensus document. Pancreas. 2010;39:549–554.
  64. Kanno A, Ishida K, Hamada Set al., et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-FNA by using a 22-gauge needle based on the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:594–602.
  65. Moon SH, Kim MH. The role of endoscopy in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:645–656.
  66. Naitoh I, Nakazawa T, Hayashi Ket al., et al. Clinical differences between mass-forming autoimmune pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:607–613.
  67. Takuma K, Kamisawa T, Gopalakrishna Ret al., et al. Strategy to differentiate autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreas cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:1015–1020.
  68. Voss M, Hammel P, Molas Get al., et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Gut. 2000;46:244–249.
  69. Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a learning curve with 300 consecutive procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:700–708.
  70. Mitsuhashi T, Ghafari S, Chang CYet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas: cytomorphological evaluation with emphasis on adequacy assessment, diagnostic criteria and contamination from the gastrointestinal tract. Cytopathology. 2006;17:34–41.
  71. Turner BG, Cizginer S, Agarwal Det al., et al. Diagnosis of pancreatic neoplasia with EUS and FNA: a report of accuracy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:91–98.
  72. Chen J, Yang R, Lu Yet al., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for solid pancreatic lesion: a systematic review. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2012;138:1433–1441.
  73. Fujii LL, Chari ST, El-Youssef Met al., et al. Pediatric pancreatic EUS-guided trucut biopsy for evaluation of autoimmune pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:824–828.
  74. Kerdsirichairat T, Saini SD, Chamberlain PRet al., et al. Autoimmune pancreatitis diagnosed with core biopsy obtained from a novel fork-tip EUS needle. ACG Case Rep J. 2017;4. e7.
  75. Dietrich CF, Hirche TO, Ott Met al., et al. Real-time tissue elastography in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2009;41:718–720.
  76. Fusaroli P, Saftoiu A, Mancino MGet al., et al. Techniques of image enhancement in EUS (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:645–655.
  77. Hocke M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2011;43:163–165.
  78. Imazu H, Kanazawa K, Mori Net al., et al. Novel quantitative perfusion analysis with contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS for differentiation of autoimmune pancreatitis from pancreatic carcinoma. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2012;47:853–860.
  79. Fujii M, Saito H, Kato Het al., et al. Diagnosis of a solid pseudopapillary neoplasm using EUS-FNA. Intern Med. 2013;52:1703–1708.
  80. Maimone A, Luigiano C, Baccarini Pet al., et al. Preoperative diagnosis of a solid pseudopapillary tumour of the pancreas by endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy: a retrospective case series. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:957–960.
  81. Yamaguchi M, Fukuda T, Nakahara Met al., et al. Multicentric solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: a case report. Surg Case Rep. 2015;1:110.
  82. Goyal A, Jain D, Bhat Iet al., et al. A unique case of pancreatic mass due to pancreatic elastofibromatosis. Case Rep Gastrointest Med. 2016;2016:2697187.
  83. Collins K, Buckley T, Anderson Ket al., et al. Perivascular epithelioid cell tumor (PEComa) of pancreas diagnosed preoperatively by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: a case report and review of literature. Diagn Cytopathol. 2017;45:59–65.
  84. Mondal U, Henkes N, Henkes Det al., et al. Cavernous hemangioma of adult pancreas: a case report and literature review. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:9793–9802.
  85. Vafa H, Arvanitakis M, Matos Cet al., et al. Pancreatic tuberculosis diagnosed by EUS: one disease, many faces. JOP. 2013;14:256–260.
  86. Maestro S, Trujillo R, Geneux Ket al., et al. Pancreatic actinomycosis presenting as pancreatic mass and diagnosed with endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). Endoscopy. 2013:45. Suppl 2 UCTN:E276–E277.
  87. Sun B, Yang X, Ping Bet al., et al. Impact of inconclusive endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration results in the management and outcome of patients with solid pancreatic masses. Dig Endosc. 2015;27:130–136.
  88. Hebert-Magee S, Bae S, Varadarajulu Set al., et al. The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Cytopathology. 2013;24:159–171.
  89. Rodriguez SA, Impey SD, Pelz Cet al., et al. RNA sequencing distinguishes benign from malignant pancreatic lesions sampled by EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:252–258.
  90. Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Endoscopy. 2016;48:339–349.
  91. Strand DS, Jeffus SK, Sauer BGet al., et al. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms. Diagn Cytopathol. 2014;42:751–758.
  92. Ying L, Lin X, Xie ZLet al., et al. Clinical utility of endoscopic ultrasound elastography for identification of malignant pancreatic masses: a meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:1434–1443.
  93. Itokawa F, Itoi T, Sofuni Aet al., et al. EUS elastography combined with the strain ratio of tissue elasticity for diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:843–853.
  94. Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino-Noia J, Abdulkader Iet al., et al. EUS elastography for the characterization of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1101–1108.
  95. Kim SY, Cho JH, Kim YJet al., et al. Diagnostic efficacy of quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography for differentiating pancreatic disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016.
  96. Iglesias-Garcia J, Larino-Noia J, Abdulkader Iet al., et al. Quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography: an accurate method for the differentiation of solid pancreatic masses. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1172–1180.
  97. Dawwas MF, Taha H, Leeds JSet al., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of quantitative EUS elastography for discriminating malignant from benign solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, single-center study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:953–961.
  98. Hocke M, Schulze E, Gottschalk Pet al., et al. Contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound in discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:246–250.
  99. Gheonea DI, Streba CT, Ciurea Tet al., et al. Quantitative low mechanical index contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound for the differential diagnosis of chronic pseudotumoral pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:2.
  100. Hocke M, Ignee A, Dietrich CF. Advanced endosonographic diagnostic tools for discrimination of focal chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma—elastography, contrast enhanced high mechanical index (CEHMI) and low mechanical index (CELMI) endosonography in direct comparison. Z Gastroenterol. 2012;50:199–203.
  101. Becker D, Strobel D, Bernatik Tet al., et al. Echo-enhanced color- and power-doppler EUS for the discrimination between focal pancreatitis and pancreatic carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:784–789.
Regresar