E-commerce Contacto
/contact

Hawes, Endosonografía 4 edición

Robert H. Hawes


  1. Sección IV: Páncreas y árbol biliar
  2. Cap. 16 Ultrasonido endoscópico en lesiones ampulares, del conducto biliar y la vesícula
Regresar

Capítulo 16 Ultrasonido endoscópico en lesiones ampulares, del conducto biliar y la vesícula.

  1. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano Get al., et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:1781–1788.
  2. Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher Jet al., et al. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:80–88.
  3. Barthet M, Lesavre N, Desjeux Aet al., et al. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: results from a single tertiary referral center. Endoscopy. 2002;34:991–997.
  4. Folkers MT, Disario JA, Adler DG. Long-term complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: a North-American perspective. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:2868–2869.
  5. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y. Risk factors predictive of late complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones: long-term (more than 10 years) follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:2763–2767.
  6. Tseng CW, Chen CC, Chen TSet al., et al. Can computed tomography with coronal reconstruction improve the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:1586–1589.
  7. Kondo S, Isayama H, Akahane Met al., et al. Detection of common bile duct stones: comparison between endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiography, and helical-computed-tomographic cholangiography. Eur J Radiol. 2005;54:271–275.
  8. Anderson SW, Rho E, Soto JA. Detection of biliary duct narrowing and choledocholithiasis: accuracy of portal venous phase multidetector CT. Radiology. 2008;247:418–427.
  9. Okada M, Fukada J, Toya Ket al., et al. The value of drip infusion cholangiography using multidetector-row helical CT in patients with choledocholithiasis. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:2140–2145.
  10. Napoleon B, Dumortier J, Keriven-Souquet Oet al., et al. Do normal findings at biliary endoscopic ultrasonography obviate the need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspicion of common bile duct stone? A prospective follow-up study of 238 patients. Endoscopy. 2003;35:411–415.
  11. Frossard JL, Sosa-Valencia L, Amouyal Get al., et al. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with “idiopathic” acute pancreatitis. Am J Med. 2000;109:196–200.
  12. Kohut M, Nowakowska-Dulawa E, Marek Tet al., et al. Accuracy of linear endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Endoscopy. 2002;34:299–303.
  13. Lachter J, Rubin A, Shiller Met al., et al. Linear EUS for bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:51–54.
  14. Wehrmann T, Martchenko K, Riphaus A. Catheter probe extraductal ultrasonography vs. conventional endoscopic ultrasonography for detection of bile duct stones. Endoscopy. 2009;41:133–137.
  15. Katanuma A, Maguchi H, Osanai Met al., et al. The difference in the capability of delineation between convex and radial arrayed echoendoscope for pancreas and biliary tract; case reports from the standpoint of both convex and radial arrayed echoendoscope. Dig Endosc. 2011;23(suppl 1):2–8.
  16. Kohut M, Nowak A, Nowakowska-Dulawa Eet al., et al. Endosonography with linear array instead of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography as the diagnostic tool in patients with moderate suspicion of common bile duct stones. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:612–614.
  17. Meroni E, Bisagni P, Bona Set al., et al. Pre-operative endoscopic ultrasonography can optimise the management of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with abnormal liver function tests as the sole risk factor for choledocholithiasis: a prospective study. Dig Liver Dis. 2004;36:73–77.
  18. Prat F, Edery J, Meduri Bet al., et al. Early EUS of the bile duct before endoscopic sphincterotomy for acute biliary pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:724–729.
  19. Ney MV, Maluf-Filho F, Sakai Pet al., et al. Echo-endoscopy versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: the influence of the size of the stone and diameter of the common bile duct. Arq Gastroenterol. 2005;42:239–243.
  20. Scheiman JM, Carlos RC, Barnett JLet al., et al. Can endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography replace ERCP in patients with suspected biliary disease? A prospective trial and cost analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2900–2904.
  21. Mofidi R, Lee AC, Madhavan KKet al., et al. The selective use of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the imaging of the axial biliary tree in patients with acute gallstone pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2008;8:55–60.
  22. Topal B, Van de Moortel M, Fieuws Set al., et al. The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease. Br J Surg. 2003;90:42–47.
  23. Scaffidi MG, Luigiano C, Consolo Pet al., et al. Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: a prospective comparative study. Minerva Med. 2009;100:341–348.
  24. Ausch C, Hochwarter G, Taher Met al., et al. Improving the safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: the routine use of preoperative magnetic resonance cholangiography. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:574–580.
  25. Griffin N, Wastle ML, Dunn WKet al., et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;15:809–813.
  26. De Waele E, Op de Beeck B, De Waele Bet al., et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in the preoperative assessment of patients with biliary pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2007;7:347–351.
  27. Hallal AH, Amortegui JD, Jeroukhimov IMet al., et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately detects common bile duct stones in resolving gallstone pancreatitis. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;200:869–875.
  28. Moon JH, Cho YD, Cha SWet al., et al. The detection of bile duct stones in suspected biliary pancreatitis: comparison of MRCP, ERCP, and intraductal US. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:1051–1057.
  29. Richard F, Boustany M, Britt LD. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for diagnosing stones in the common bile duct in patients with abnormal intraoperative cholangiograms. Am J Surg. 2013;205:371–373.
  30. Norero E, Norero B, Huete Aet al., et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the diagnosis of common bile duct stones. Rev Med Chil. 2008;136:600–605.
  31. Gautier G, Pilleul F, Crombe-Ternamian Aet al., et al. Contribution of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to the management of patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2004;28:129–134.
  32. Cervi C, Aube C, Tuech JJet al., et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance cholangiography in biliary disease. Prospective study in 60 patients. Ann Chir. 2000;125:428–434.
  33. Demartines N, Eisner L, Schnabel Ket al., et al. Evaluation of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of bile duct stones. Arch Surg. 2000;135:148–152.
  34. Stiris MG, Tennoe B, Aadland Eet al., et al. MR cholangiopancreaticography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography in patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Acta Radiol. 2000;41:269–272.
  35. Kim JH, Kim MJ, Park SIet al., et al. MR cholangiography in symptomatic gallstones: diagnostic accuracy according to clinical risk group. Radiology. 2002;224:410–416.
  36. Taylor AC, Little AF, Hennessy OFet al., et al. Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:17–22.
  37. Badger WR, Borgert AJ, Kallies KJet al., et al. Utility of MRCP in clinical decision making of suspected choledocholithiasis: an institutional analysis and literature review. Am J Surg. 2017;214:251–255.
  38. Rosch T, Meining A, Fruhmorgen Set al., et al. A prospective comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of ERCP, MRCP, CT, and EUS in biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:870–876.
  39. MacEneaney P, Mitchell MT, McDermott R. Update on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2002;31:731–746.
  40. Savides TJ. EUS-guided ERCP for patients with intermediate probability for choledocholithiasis: is it time for all of us to start doing this? Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:669–672.
  41. Mendler MH, Bouillet P, Sautereau Det al., et al. Value of MR cholangiography in the diagnosis of obstructive diseases of the biliary tree: a study of 58 cases. Am J Gastroenterol. 1998;93:2482–2490.
  42. Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen Oet al., et al. Use of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: prospective comparison with a reference imaging method. Gut. 1999;44:118–122.
  43. Chen W, Mo JJ, Lin Let al., et al. Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:3351–3360.
  44. Garrow D, Miller S, Sinha Det al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5:616–623.
  45. Tse F, Liu L, Barkun ANet al., et al. EUS: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:235–244.
  46. Al Samaraee A, Khan U, Almashta Zet al., et al. Preoperative diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: the role of MRCP. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2009;70:339–343.
  47. Aube C, Delorme B, Yzet Tet al., et al. MR cholangiopancreatography versus endoscopic sonography in suspected common bile duct lithiasis: a prospective, comparative study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:55–62.
  48. Frossard JL, Hadengue A, Amouyal Get al., et al. Choledocholithiasis: a prospective study of spontaneous common bile duct stone migration. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:175–179.
  49. Ainsworth AP, Rafaelsen SR, Wamberg PAet al., et al. Cost-effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasonography, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients suspected of pancreaticobiliary disease. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:579–583.
  50. Materne R, Van Beers BE, Gigot JFet al., et al. Extrahepatic biliary obstruction: magnetic resonance imaging compared with endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy. 2000;32:3–9.
  51. Montariol T, Msika S, Charlier Aet al., et al. Diagnosis of asymptomatic common bile duct stones: preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography versus intraoperative cholangiography—a multicenter, prospective controlled study. French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery. 1998;124:6–13.
  52. Ledro-Cano D. Suspected choledocholithiasis: endoscopic ultrasound or magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography? A systematic review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;19:1007–1011.
  53. Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen GMet al., et al. EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:248–254.
  54. De Castro VL, Moura EG, Chaves DMet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in suspected choledocholithiasis: a systematic review. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016;5:118–128.
  55. Buscarini E, Tansini P, Vallisa Det al., et al. EUS for suspected choledocholithiasis: do benefits outweigh costs? A prospective, controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:510–518.
  56. Karakan T, Cindoruk M, Alagozlu Het al., et al. EUS versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:244–252.
  57. Lee YT, Chan FK, Leung WKet al., et al. Comparison of EUS and ERCP in the investigation with suspected biliary obstruction caused by choledocholithiasis: a randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:660–668.
  58. Petrov MS, Savides TJ. Systematic review of endoscopic ultrasonography versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for suspected choledocholithiasis. Br J Surg. 2009;96:967–974.
  59. Committee ASoP Maple JT, Ben-Menachem Tet al., et al. The role of endoscopy in the evaluation of suspected choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:1–9.
  60. He H, Tan C, Wu Jet al., et al. Accuracy of ASGE high-risk criteria in evaluation of patients with suspected common bile duct stones. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;86:525–532.
  61. Netinatsunton N, Attasaranya S, Sottisuporn Jet al., et al. Comparing cost-effectiveness between endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in diagnosis of common bile duct stone in patients with predefined risks: a study from a developing country. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016;5:165–172.
  62. Abboud PA, Malet PF, Berlin JAet al., et al. Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:450–455.
  63. Canto MI, Chak A, Stellato Tet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography versus cholangiography for the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:439–448.
  64. Jeon TJ, Cho JH, Kim YSet al., et al. Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasonography in symptomatic patients with high and intermediate probabilities of common bile duct stones and a negative computed tomography scan. Gut Liver. 2017;11:290–297.
  65. Amouyal P, Amouyal G, Levy Pet al., et al. Diagnosis of choledocholithiasis by endoscopic ultrasonography. Gastroenterology. 1994;106:1062–1067.
  66. Berdah SV, Orsoni P, Bege Tet al., et al. Follow-up of selective endoscopic ultrasonography and/or endoscopic retrograde cholangiography prior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study of 300 patients. Endoscopy. 2001;33:216–220.
  67. Makary MA, Duncan MD, Harmon JWet al., et al. The role of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the management of patients with gallstone pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 2005;241:119–124.
  68. Palazzo L, Girollet PP, Salmeron Met al., et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones: comparison with surgical exploration and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;42:225–231.
  69. Prat F, Amouyal G, Amouyal Pet al., et al. Prospective controlled study of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with suspected common-bileduct lithiasis. Lancet. 1996;347:75–79.
  70. Sahai AV, Mauldin PD, Marsi Vet al., et al. Bile duct stones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a decision analysis to assess the roles of intraoperative cholangiography, EUS, and ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:334–343.
  71. Bret PM, Reinhold C. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy. 1997;29:472–486.
  72. Dittrick G, Lamont JP, Kuhn JAet al., et al. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound in patients at high risk of choledocholithiasis. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2005;18:211–213.
  73. Das A, Chak A. Endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy. 2004;36:17–22.
  74. Benjaminov F, Stein A, Lichtman Get al., et al. Consecutive versus separate sessions of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for symptomatic choledocholithiasis. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2117–2121.
  75. Fabbri C, Polifemo AM, Luigiano Cet al., et al. Single session versus separate session endoscopic ultrasonography plus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in patients with low to moderate risk for choledocholithiasis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24:1107–1112.
  76. Polkowski M, Regula J, Tilszer Aet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound versus endoscopic retrograde cholangiography for patients with intermediate probability of bile duct stones: a randomized trial comparing two management strategies. Endoscopy. 2007;39:296–303.
  77. Kim KM, Lee JK, Bahng Set al., et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in patients with intermediate probability of choledocholithiasis but a negative CT scan. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47:449–456.
  78. Alhayaf N, Lalor E, Bain Vet al., et al. The clinical impact and cost implication of endoscopic ultrasound on use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in a Canadian university hospital. Can J Gastroenterol. 2008;22:138–142.
  79. Arguedas MR, Dupont AW, Wilcox CM. Where do ERCP, endoscopic ultrasound, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and intraoperative cholangiography fit in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis? A decision analysis model. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:2892–2899.
  80. Romagnuolo J, Currie G. Noninvasive vs. selective invasive biliary imaging for acute biliary pancreatitis: an economic evaluation by using decision tree analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:86–97.
  81. Seifert H, Wehrmann T, Hilgers Ret al., et al. Catheter probe extraductal EUS reliably detects distal common bile duct abnormalities. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:61–67.
  82. Catanzaro A, Pfau P, Isenberg GAet al., et al. Clinical utility of intraductal US for evaluation of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:648–652.
  83. Tsuchiya S, Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Yet al., et al. Clinical utility of intraductal US to decrease early recurrence rate of common bile duct stones after endoscopic papillotomy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:1590–1595.
  84. Sotoudehmanesh R, Kolahdoozan S, Asgari AAet al., et al. Role of endoscopic ultrasonography in prevention of unnecessary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a prospective study of 150 patients. J Ultrasound Med. 2007;26:455–460.
  85. Lu J, Guo CY, Xu XFet al., et al. Efficacy of intraductal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of non-opaque choledocholith. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:275–278.
  86. Mirbagheri SA, Mohamadnejad M, Nasiri Jet al., et al. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of biliary microlithiasis in patients with normal transabdominal ultrasonography. J Gastrointest Surg. 2005;9:961–964.
  87. Thorboll J, Vilmann P, Jacobsen Bet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in detection of cholelithiasis in patients with biliary pain and negative transabdominal ultrasonography. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:267–269.
  88. Kaw M, Brodmerkel Jr. GJ. ERCP, biliary crystal analysis, and sphincter of Oddi manometry in idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;55:157–162.
  89. Lee SP, Hayashi A, Kim YS. Biliary sludge: curiosity or culprit? Hepatology. 1994;20:523–525.
  90. Liu CL, Lo CM, Chan JKet al., et al. EUS for detection of occult cholelithiasis in patients with idiopathic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;51:28–32.
  91. Yusoff IF, Raymond G, Sahai AV. A prospective comparison of the yield of EUS in primary vs. recurrent idiopathic acute pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:673–678.
  92. Wilcox CM, Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi M. Role of endoscopic evaluation in idiopathic pancreatitis: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:1037–1045.
  93. Wilcox CM, Kilgore M. Cost minimization analysis comparing diagnostic strategies in unexplained pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2009;38:117–121.
  94. Park MS, Kim TK, Kim KWet al., et al. Differentiation of extrahepatic bile duct cholangiocarcinoma from benign stricture: findings at MRCP versus ERCP. Radiology. 2004;233:234–240.
  95. Zidi SH, Prat F, Le Guen Oet al., et al. Performance characteristics of magnetic resonance cholangiography in the staging of malignant hilar strictures. Gut. 2000;46:103–106.
  96. Stewart CJ, Mills PR, Carter Ret al., et al. Brush cytology in the assessment of pancreatico-biliary strictures: a review of 406 cases. J Clin Pathol. 2001;54:449–455.
  97. Cote GA, Sherman S. Biliary stricture and negative cytology: what next? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:739–743.
  98. Glasbrenner B, Ardan M, Boeck Wet al., et al. Prospective evaluation of brush cytology of biliary strictures during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Endoscopy. 1999;31:712–717.
  99. Kipp BR, Stadheim LM, Halling SAet al., et al. A comparison of routine cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of malignant bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1675–1681.
  100. Lee JG, Leung JW, Baillie Jet al., et al. Benign, dysplastic, or malignant—making sense of endoscopic bile duct brush cytology: results in 149 consecutive patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 1995;90:722–726.
  101. Fritcher EG, Kipp BR, Halling KCet al., et al. A multivariable model using advanced cytologic methods for the evaluation of indeterminate pancreatobiliary strictures. Gastroenterology. 2009;136:2180–2186.
  102. Levy MJ, Baron TH, Clayton ACet al., et al. Prospective evaluation of advanced molecular markers and imaging techniques in patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:1263–1273.
  103. Chaiteerakij R, Barr Fritcher EG, Angsuwatcharakon Pet al., et al. Fluorescence in situ hybridization compared with conventional cytology for the diagnosis of malignant biliary tract strictures in Asian patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:1228–1235.
  104. Levy MJ, Oberg TN, Campion MBet al., et al. Comparison of methods to detect neoplasia in patients undergoing endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:1112–1121. e2.
  105. Gonda TA, Glick MP, Sethi Aet al., et al. Polysomy and p16 deletion by fluorescence in situ hybridization in the diagnosis of indeterminate biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:74–79.
  106. Smoczynski M, Jablonska A, Matyskiel Aet al., et al. Routine brush cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for assessment of pancreatobiliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:65–73.
  107. Gonda TA, Viterbo D, Gausman Vet al., et al. Mutation profile and fluorescence in situ hybridization analyses increase detection of malignancies in biliary strictures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15:913–919.
  108. de Bellis M, Sherman S, Fogel ELet al., et al. Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (Part 2). Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:720–730.
  109. De Bellis M, Sherman S, Fogel ELet al., et al. Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (Part 1). Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:552–561.
  110. Higashizawa T, Tamada K, Tomiyama Tet al., et al. Biliary guidewire facilitates bile duct biopsy and endoscopic drainage. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;17:332–336.
  111. Farrell RJ, Jain AK, Brandwein SLet al., et al. The combination of stricture dilation, endoscopic needle aspiration, and biliary brushings significantly improves diagnostic yield from malignant bile duct strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:587–594.
  112. de Bellis M, Fogel EL, Sherman Set al., et al. Influence of stricture dilation and repeat brushing on the cancer detection rate of brush cytology in the evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:176–182.
  113. Curcio G, Traina M, Mocciaro Fet al., et al. Intraductal aspiration: a promising new tissue-sampling technique for the diagnosis of suspected malignant biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:798–804.
  114. Sakuma Y, Kodama Y, Sogabe Yet al., et al. Diagnostic performance of a new endoscopic scraper for malignant biliary strictures: a multicenter prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:371–379.
  115. Navaneethan U, Hasan MK, Kommaraju Ket al., et al. Digital, single-operator cholangiopancreatoscopy in the diagnosis and management of pancreatobiliary disorders: a multicenter clinical experience (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:649–655.
  116. Chen YK, Parsi MA, Binmoeller KFet al., et al. Single-operator cholangioscopy in patients requiring evaluation of bile duct disease or therapy of biliary stones (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:805–814.
  117. Chen YK, Pleskow DK. SpyGlass single-operator peroral cholangiopancreatoscopy system for the diagnosis and therapy of bile-duct disorders: a clinical feasibility study (with video). Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65:832–841.
  118. Draganov PV, Chauhan S, Wagh MSet al., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and cholangioscopy-guided sampling of indeterminate biliary lesions at the time of ERCP: a prospective, long-term follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:347–353.
  119. Osanai M, Itoi T, Igarashi Yet al., et al. Peroral video cholangioscopy to evaluate indeterminate bile duct lesions and preoperative mucosal cancerous extension: a prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy. 2013;45:635–642.
  120. Parsi MA, Jang S, Sanaka Met al., et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic cholangiopancreatoscopy: performance of a new digital cholangioscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;79:936–942.
  121. Songur Y, Temucin G, Sahin B. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the evaluation of dilated common bile duct. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;33:302–305.
  122. Sadeghi A, Mohamadnejad M, Islami Fet al., et al. Diagnostic yield of EUS-guided FNA for malignant biliary stricture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83:290–298. e1.
  123. Agarwal B, Abu-Hamda E, Molke KLet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and multidetector spiral CT in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:844–850.
  124. Gress F, Gottlieb K, Sherman Set al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspected pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:459–464.
  125. Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ. Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1386–1391.
  126. Hollerbach S, Klamann A, Topalidis Tet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Endoscopy. 2001;33:824–831.
  127. Menzel J, Poremba C, Dietl KHet al., et al. Preoperative diagnosis of bile duct strictures—comparison of intraductal ultrasonography with conventional endosonography. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000;35:77–82.
  128. Palazzo L, Roseau G, Gayet Bet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Results of a prospective study with comparison to ultrasonography and CT scan. Endoscopy. 1993;25:143–150.
  129. Raut CP, Grau AM, Staerkel GAet al., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with presumed pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:118–126. discussion 127–128.
  130. Varadarajulu S, Tamhane A, Eloubeidi MA. Yield of EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic masses in the presence or the absence of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:728–736. quiz 751, 753.
  131. Mohamadnejad M, DeWitt JM, Sherman Set al., et al. Role of EUS for preoperative evaluation of cholangiocarcinoma: a large single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:71–78.
  132. Weilert F, Bhat YM, Binmoeller KFet al., et al. EUS-FNA is superior to ERCP-based tissue sampling in suspected malignant biliary obstruction: results of a prospective, single-blind, comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:97–104.
  133. Byrne MF, Gerke H, Mitchell RMet al., et al. Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of bile duct lesions. Endoscopy. 2004;36:715–719.
  134. DeWitt J, Misra VL, Leblanc JKet al., et al. EUS-guided FNA of proximal biliary strictures after negative ERCP brush cytology results. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:325–333.
  135. Fritscher-Ravens A, Broering DC, Sriram PVet al., et al. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration cytodiagnosis of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a case series. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:534–540.
  136. Lee JH, Salem R, Aslanian Het al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound and fine-needle aspiration of unexplained bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1069–1073.
  137. Meara RS, Jhala D, Eloubeidi MAet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA biopsy of bile duct and gallbladder: analysis of 53 cases. Cytopathology. 2006;17:42–49.
  138. Rosch T, Hofrichter K, Frimberger Eet al., et al. ERCP or EUS for tissue diagnosis of biliary strictures? A prospective comparative study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:390–396.
  139. Eloubeidi MA, Chen VK, Jhala NCet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of suspected cholangiocarcinoma. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004;2:209–213.
  140. Fritscher-Ravens A, Broering DC, Knoefel WTet al., et al. EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration of suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma in potentially operable patients with negative brush cytology. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:45–51.
  141. Tummala P, Munigala S, Eloubeidi MAet al., et al. Patients with obstructive jaundice and biliary stricture+/-mass lesion on imaging: prevalence of malignancy and potential role of EUS-FNA. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47:532–537.
  142. Ohshima Y, Yasuda I, Kawakami Het al., et al. EUS-FNA for suspected malignant biliary strictures after negative endoscopic transpapillary brush cytology and forceps biopsy. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:921–928.
  143. Nayar MK, Manas DM, Wadehra Vet al., et al. Role of EUS/EUS-guided FNA in the management of proximal biliary strictures. Hepatogastroenterology. 2011;58:1862–1865.
  144. Saifuku Y, Yamagata M, Koike Tet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography can diagnose distal biliary strictures without a mass on computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:237–244.
  145. Tellez-Avila FI, Bernal-Mendez AR, Guerrero-Vazquez CGet al., et al. Diagnostic yield of EUS-guided tissue acquisition as a first-line approach in patients with suspected hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:1294–1296.
  146. Horwhat JD, Paulson EK, McGrath Ket al., et al. A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;63:966–975.
  147. Larghi A, Lecca PG, Ardito Fet al., et al. Evaluation of hilar biliary strictures by using a newly developed forward-viewing therapeutic echoendoscope: preliminary results of an ongoing experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:356–360.
  148. Lee S, Seo DW, Choi JHet al., et al. Evaluation of the feasibility and efficacy of forward-viewing endoscopic ultrasound. Gut Liver. 2015;9:679–684.
  149. Siddiqui UD, Rossi F, Rosenthal LSet al., et al. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1093–1097.
  150. Lee JK, Lee KT, Choi ERet al., et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48:752–757.
  151. Madhoun MF, Wani SB, Rastogi Aet al., et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2013;45:86–92.
  152. Ranney N, Phadnis M, Trevino Jet al., et al. Impact of biliary stents on EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:76–83.
  153. Fisher JM, Gordon SR, Gardner TB. The impact of prior biliary stenting on the accuracy and complication rate of endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Pancreas. 2011;40:21–24.
  154. Paquin SC, Gariepy G, Lepanto Let al., et al. A first report of tumor seeding because of EUS-guided FNA of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:610–611.
  155. Shah JN, Fraker D, Guerry Det al., et al. Melanoma seeding of an EUS-guided fine needle track. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:923–924.
  156. Doi S, Yasuda I, Iwashita Tet al., et al. Needle tract implantation on the esophageal wall after EUS-guided FNA of metastatic mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:988–990.
  157. Ito Y, Asahi S, Matsuzuka Fet al., et al. Needle tract implantation of follicular neoplasm after fine-needle aspiration biopsy: report of a case. Thyroid. 2006;16:1059–1062.
  158. Suzuki K, Takamochi K, Funai Ket al., et al. Needle tract implantation clearly visualized by computed tomography following needle biopsy of malignant mesothelioma. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006;29:1051.
  159. Fowler N, Asatiani E, Cheson B. Needle tract seeding after bone marrow biopsy in non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2008;49:156–158.
  160. Chang S, Kim SH, Lim HKet al., et al. Needle tract implantation after percutaneous interventional procedures in hepatocellular carcinomas: lessons learned from a 10-year experience. Korean J Radiol. 2008;9:268–274.
  161. Rowe LR, Mulvihill SJ, Emerson Let al., et al. Subcutaneous tumor seeding following needle core biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol. 2007;35:717–721.
  162. Liu Y-W, Chen C-L, Chen Y-Set al., et al. Needle tract implantation of hepatocellular carcinoma after fine needle biopsy. Dig Dis Sci. 2007;52:228–231.
  163. Lundstedt C, Stridbeck H, Andersson Ret al., et al. Tumor seeding occurring after fine-needle biopsy of abdominal malignancies. Acta Radiologica. 1991;32:518–520.
  164. Smith EH. Complications of percutaneous abdominal fine-needle biopsy. Radiology. 1991;178:253–258.
  165. Micames C, Jowell PS, White Ret al., et al. Lower frequency of peritoneal carcinomatosis in patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA vs. percutaneous FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:690–695.
  166. Silva MA, Hegab B, Hyde Cet al., et al. Needle track seeding following biopsy of liver lesions in the diagnosis of hepatocellular cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2008;57:1592–1596.
  167. Heimbach JK, Sanchez W, Rosen CBet al., et al. Trans-peritoneal fine needle aspiration biopsy of hilar cholangiocarcinoma is associated with disease dissemination. HPB. 2011;13:356–360.
  168. El Chafic AH, Dewitt J, Leblanc JKet al., et al. Impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration on postoperative recurrence and survival in cholangiocarcinoma patients. Endoscopy. 2013;45:883–889.
  169. Farrell RJ, Agarwal B, Brandwein SLet al., et al. Intraductal US is a useful adjunct to ERCP for distinguishing malignant from benign biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:681–687.
  170. Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Baron TH, Clain JEet al., et al. Evaluation of indeterminate bile duct strictures by intraductal US. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:372–379.
  171. Domagk D, Wessling J, Reimer Pet al., et al. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, intraductal ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in bile duct strictures: a prospective comparison of imaging diagnostics with histopathological correlation. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:1684–1689.
  172. Krishna NB, Saripalli S, Safdar Ret al., et al. Intraductal US in evaluation of biliary strictures without a mass lesion on CT scan or magnetic resonance imaging: significance of focal wall thickening and extrinsic compression at the stricture site. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:90–96.
  173. Stavropoulos S, Larghi A, Verna Eet al., et al. Intraductal ultrasound for the evaluation of patients with biliary strictures and no abdominal mass on computed tomography. Endoscopy. 2005;37:715–721.
  174. Tamada K, Nagai H, Yasuda Yet al., et al. Transpapillary intraductal US prior to biliary drainage in the assessment of longitudinal spread of extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:300–307.
  175. Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi MA, Wilcox CM. Prospective evaluation of indeterminate ERCP findings by intraductal ultrasound. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;22:2086–2092.
  176. Tamada K, Tomiyama T, Wada Set al., et al. Endoscopic transpapillary bile duct biopsy with the combination of intraductal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of biliary strictures. Gut. 2002;50:326–331.
  177. Tamada K, Ueno N, Tomiyama Tet al., et al. Characterization of biliary strictures using intraductal ultrasonography: comparison with percutaneous cholangioscopic biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:341–349.
  178. Heinzow HS, Kammerer S, Rammes Cet al., et al. Comparative analysis of ERCP, IDUS, EUS and CT in predicting malignant bile duct strictures. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:10495–10503.
  179. Wehrmann T, Riphaus A, Martchenko Ket al., et al. Intraductal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of Mirizzi syndrome. Endoscopy. 2006;38:717–722.
  180. Dumortier J, Scoazec JY, Valette PJet al., et al. Successful liver transplantation for diffuse biliary papillomatosis. J Hepatol. 2001;35:542–543.
  181. Tamada K, Tomiyama T, Oohashi Aet al., et al. Bile duct wall thickness measured by intraductal US in patients who have not undergone previous biliary drainage. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:199–203.
  182. Tischendorf JJ, Meier PN, Schneider Aet al., et al. Transpapillary intraductal ultrasound in the evaluation of dominant bile duct stenoses in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:1011–1017.
  183. Itoi T, Reddy DN, Sofuni Aet al., et al. Clinical evaluation of a prototype multi-bending peroral direct cholangioscope. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:100–107.
  184. Fukuda Y, Tsuyuguchi T, Sakai Yet al., et al. Diagnostic utility of peroral cholangioscopy for various bile-duct lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:374–382.
  185. Nguyen NQ, Schoeman MN, Ruszkiewicz A. Clinical utility of EUS before cholangioscopy in the evaluation of difficult biliary strictures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:868–874.
  186. Siddiqui AA, Mehendiratta V, Jackson Wet al., et al. Identification of cholangiocarcinoma by using the Spyglass Spyscope system for peroral cholangioscopy and biopsy collection. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:466–471. quiz e48.
  187. Njei B, McCarty TR, Varadarajulu Set al., et al. Cost utility of ERCP-based modalities for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85:773–781..e10.
  188. Tanaka R, Itoi T, Honjo Met al., et al. New digital cholangiopancreatoscopy for diagnosis and therapy of pancreaticobiliary diseases (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23:220–226.
  189. Sethi A, Chen YK, Austin GLet al., et al. ERCP with cholangiopancreatoscopy may be associated with higher rates of complications than ERCP alone: a single-center experience. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:251–256.
  190. Sai JK, Suyama M, Kubokawa Yet al., et al. Early detection of extrahepatic bile-duct carcinomas in the nonicteric stage by using MRCP followed by EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:29–36.
  191. Mishra G, Conway JD. Endoscopic ultrasound in the evaluation of radiologic abnormalities of the liver and biliary tree. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2009;11:150–154.
  192. Meister T, Heinzow HS, Woestmeyer Cet al., et al. Intraductal ultrasound substantiates diagnostics of bile duct strictures of uncertain etiology. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:874–881.
  193. Nimura Y. Staging cholangiocarcinoma by cholangioscopy. HPB (Oxford). 2008;10:113–115.
  194. Sato M, Inoue H, Ogawa Set al., et al. Limitations of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopy for the diagnosis of the intramural extension of bile duct carcinoma. Endoscopy. 1998;30:281–288.
  195. Inui K, Miyoshi H. Cholangiocarcinoma and intraductal sonography. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2005;15:143–155. x.
  196. Tamada K, Tomiyama T, Ichiyama Met al., et al. Influence of biliary drainage catheter on bile duct wall thickness as measured by intraductal ultrasonography. Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;47:28–32.
  197. Myers RP, Shaffer EA, Beck PL. Gallbladder polyps: epidemiology, natural history and management. Can J Gastroenterol. 2002;16:187–194.
  198. Sugiyama M, Atomi Y, Yamato T. Endoscopic ultrasonography for differential diagnosis of polypoid gall bladder lesions: analysis in surgical and follow up series. Gut. 2000;46:250–254.
  199. Kim JS, Lee JK, Kim Yet al., et al. US characteristics for the prediction of neoplasm in gallbladder polyps 10 mm or larger. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:1134–1140.
  200. Choi WB, Lee SK, Kim MHet al., et al. A new strategy to predict the neoplastic polyps of the gallbladder based on a scoring system using EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2000;52:372–379.
  201. Corwin MT, Siewert B, Sheiman RGet al., et al. Incidentally detected gallbladder polyps: is follow-up necessary?—Long-term clinical and US analysis of 346 patients. Radiology. 2011;258:277–282.
  202. Wiles R, Varadpande M, Muly Set al., et al. Growth rate and malignant potential of small gallbladder polyps—systematic review of evidence. Surgeon. 2014;12:221–226.
  203. French DG, Allen PD, Ellsmere JC. The diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal ultrasonography needs to be considered when managing gallbladder polyps. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4021–4025.
  204. Azuma T, Yoshikawa T, Araida Tet al., et al. Differential diagnosis of polypoid lesions of the gallbladder by endoscopic ultrasonography. Am J Surg. 2001;181:65–70.
  205. Choi JH, Seo DW, Park DHet al., et al. Utility of contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS in the diagnosis of malignant gallbladder polyps (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;78:484–493.
  206. Lee JS, Kim JH, Kim YJet al., et al. Diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal high-resolution US for staging gallbladder cancer and differential diagnosis of neoplastic polyps compared with EUS. Eur Radiol. 2017;27:3097–3103.
  207. Sadamoto Y, Oda S, Tanaka Met al., et al. A useful approach to the differential diagnosis of small polypoid lesions of the gallbladder, utilizing an endoscopic ultrasound scoring system. Endoscopy. 2002;34:959–965.
  208. Cho JH, Park JY, Kim YJet al., et al. Hypoechoic foci on EUS are simple and strong predictive factors for neoplastic gallbladder polyps. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1244–1250.
  209. Cheon YK, Cho WY, Lee THet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography does not differentiate neoplastic from non-neoplastic small gallbladder polyps. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:2361–2366.
  210. Park CH, Chung MJ, Oh TGet al., et al. Differential diagnosis between gallbladder adenomas and cholesterol polyps on contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1414–1421.
  211. Kimura K, Fujita N, Noda Yet al., et al. Differential diagnosis of large-sized pedunculated polypoid lesions of the gallbladder by endoscopic ultrasonography: a prospective study. J Gastroenterol. 2001;36:619–622.
  212. Nasiri S, Gafuri A, Karamnejad Met al., et al. Four port-site recurrences of gall bladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ANZ J Surg. 2009;79:75–76.
  213. Hu JB, Sun XN, Xu Jet al., et al. Port site and distant metastases of gallbladder cancer after laparoscopic cholecystectomy diagnosed by positron emission tomography. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:6428–6431.
  214. Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi Get al., et al. Diagnosis of the depth of invasion of gallbladder carcinoma by EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:659–663.
  215. Sadamoto Y, Kubo H, Harada Net al., et al. Preoperative diagnosis and staging of gallbladder carcinoma by EUS. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:536–541.
  216. Hijioka S, Hara K, Mizuno Net al., et al. Diagnostic yield of endoscopic retrograde cholangiography and of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration sampling in gallbladder carcinomas. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2012;19:650–655.
  217. Hijioka S, Mekky MA, Bhatia Vet al., et al. Can EUS-guided FNA distinguish between gallbladder cancer and xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis? Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:622–627.
  218. Jacobson BC, Pitman MB, Brugge WR. EUS-guided FNA for the diagnosis of gallbladder masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;57:251–254.
  219. Kim HJ, Lee SK, Jang JWet al., et al. Diagnostic role of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration of gallbladder lesions. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012;59:1691–1695.
  220. Varadarajulu S, Eloubeidi MA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in the evaluation of gallbladder masses. Endoscopy. 2005;37:751–754.
  221. Antonini F, Acito L, Sisti Set al., et al. Metastatic melanoma of the gallbladder diagnosed by EUS-guided FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:1072–1073.
  222. Jacobson BC, Waxman I, Parmar Ket al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided gallbladder bile aspiration in idiopathic pancreatitis carries a significant risk of bile peritonitis. Pancreatology. 2002;2:26–29.
  223. Downing SR, Cadogan KA, Ortega Get al., et al. Early-stage gallbladder cancer in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database: effect of extended surgical resection. Arch Surg. 2011;146:734–738.
  224. Fujimoto T, Kato Y, Kitamura Tet al., et al. Case report: hypoechoic area as an ultrasound finding suggesting subserosal invasion in polypoid carcinoma of the gall bladder. Br J Radiol. 2001;74:455–457.
  225. Kim MY, Baik SK, Choi YJet al., et al. Endoscopic sonographic evaluation of the thickened gallbladder wall in patients with acute hepatitis. J Clin Ultrasound. 2003;31:245–249.
  226. Sato M, Ishida H, Konno Ket al., et al. Segmental chronic cholecystitis: sonographic findings and clinical manifestations. Abdom Imaging. 2002;27:43–46.
  227. Ishizuka D, Shirai Y, Tsukada Ket al., et al. Gallbladder cancer with intratumoral anechoic foci: a mimic of adenomyomatosis. Hepatogastroenterology. 1998;45:927–929.
  228. Nabatame N, Shirai Y, Nishimura Aet al., et al. High risk of gallbladder carcinoma in elderly patients with segmental adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2004;23:593–598.
  229. Guzman-Valdivia G. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: 15 years’ experience. World J Surg. 2004;28:254–257.
  230. Muguruma N, Okamura S, Okahisa Tet al., et al. Endoscopic sonography in the diagnosis of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis. J Clin Ultrasound. 1999;27:347–350.
  231. Mizuguchi M, Kudo S, Fukahori Tet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography for demonstrating loss of multiple-layer pattern of the thickened gallbladder wall in the preoperative diagnosis of gallbladder cancer. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:1323–1327.
  232. Kim HJ, Park JH, Park DIet al., et al. Clinical usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening. Dig Dis Sci. 2012;57:508–515.
  233. Imazu H, Mori N, Kanazawa Ket al., et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of gallbladder wall thickening. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:1909–1916.
  234. Eaton JE, Thackeray EW, Lindor KD. Likelihood of malignancy in gallbladder polyps and outcomes following cholecystectomy in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:431–439.
  235. Palazzo L, Hochain P, Helmer Cet al., et al. Biliary varices on endoscopic ultrasonography: clinical presentation and outcome. Endoscopy. 2000;32:520–524.
  236. Tanno S, Obara T, Maguchi Het al., et al. Thickened inner hypoechoic layer of the gallbladder wall in the diagnosis of anomalous pancreaticobiliary ductal union with endosonography. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;46:520–526.
  237. Kawakatsu M, Vilgrain V, Zins Met al., et al. Radiologic features of papillary adenoma and papillomatosis of the biliary tract. Abdom Imaging. 1997;22:87–90.
  238. Ogura T, Kurisu Y, Masuda Det al., et al. Can endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration offer clinical benefit for thick-walled gallbladders? Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59:1917–1924.
  239. Laleman W, Verreth A, Topal Bet al., et al. Endoscopic resection of ampullary lesions: a single-center 8-year retrospective cohort study of 91 patients with long-term follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3865–3876.
  240. Gluck N, Strul H, Rozner Get al., et al. Endoscopy and EUS are key for effective surveillance and management of duodenal adenomas in familial adenomatous polyposis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:960–966.
  241. Sommerville CA, Limongelli P, Pai Met al., et al. Survival analysis after pancreatic resection for ampullary and pancreatic head carcinoma: an analysis of clinicopathological factors. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:651–656.
  242. Kim HN, Kim KM, Shin JUet al., et al. Prediction of carcinoma after resection in subjects with ampullary adenomas on endoscopic biopsy. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47:346–351.
  243. Will U, Bosseckert H, Meyer F. Correlation of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for differential diagnostics between inflammatory and neoplastic lesions of the papilla of Vater and the peripapillary region with results of histologic investigation. Ultraschall Med. 2008;29:275–280.
  244. Keriven O, Napoléon B, Souquet JCet al., et al. Patterns of the ampulla of Vater at endoscopic ultrasonography (abstract). Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:A290.
  245. Pang JC, Minter RM, Kwon RSet al., et al. The role of cytology in the preoperative assessment and management of patients with pancreaticobiliary tract neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:501–510.
  246. Defrain C, Chang CY, Srikureja Wet al., et al. Cytologic features and diagnostic pitfalls of primary ampullary tumors by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy. Cancer. 2005;105:289–297.
  247. Ridtitid W, Schmidt SE, Al-Haddad MAet al., et al. Performance characteristics of EUS for locoregional evaluation of ampullary lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:380–388.
  248. Amin MB, Edge S, Greene Fet al., et al., eds. American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual. 8th ed. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing AG; 2017.
  249. Cannon ME, Carpenter SL, Elta GHet al., et al. EUS compared with CT, magnetic resonance imaging, and angiography and the influence of biliary stenting on staging accuracy of ampullary neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:27–33.
  250. Tio TL, Sie LH, Kallimanis Get al., et al. Staging of ampullary and pancreatic carcinoma: comparison between endosonography and surgery. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:706–713.
  251. Yoshida T, Matsumoto T, Shibata Ket al., et al. Patterns of lymph node metastasis in carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Hepatogastroenterology. 2000;47:880–883.
  252. Winter JM, Cameron JL, Olino Ket al., et al. Clinicopathologic analysis of ampullary neoplasms in 450 patients: implications for surgical strategy and long-term prognosis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2010;14:379–387.
  253. Nakao A, Harada A, Nonami Tet al., et al. Prognosis of cancer of the duodenal papilla of Vater in relation to clinicopathological tumor extension. Hepatogastroenterology. 1994;41:73–78.
  254. Shirai Y, Tsukada K, Ohtani Tet al., et al. Carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater: histopathologic analysis of tumor spread in Whipple pancreatoduodenectomy specimens. World J Surg. 1995;19:102–106. discussion 106–107.
  255. Yamaguchi K, Enjoji M. Carcinoma of the ampulla of vater. A clinicopathologic study and pathologic staging of 109 cases of carcinoma and 5 cases of adenoma. Cancer. 1987;59:506–515.
  256. Artifon EL, Couto Jr. D, Sakai Pet al., et al. Prospective evaluation of EUS versus CT scan for staging of ampullary cancer. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:290–296.
  257. Buscail L, Pages P, Berthelemy Pet al., et al. Role of EUS in the management of pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma: a prospective study assessing resectability and prognosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;50:34–40.
  258. Chen CH, Yang CC, Yeh YHet al., et al. Reappraisal of endosonography of ampullary tumors: correlation with transabdominal sonography, CT, and MRI. J Clin Ultrasound. 2009;37:18–25.
  259. Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Yet al., et al. Preoperative evaluation of ampullary neoplasm with EUS and transpapillary intraductal US: a prospective and histopathologically controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:740–747.
  260. Maluf-Filho F, Sakai P, Cunha JEet al., et al. Radial endoscopic ultrasound and spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis and staging of periampullary tumors. Pancreatology. 2004;4:122–128.
  261. Midwinter MJ, Beveridge CJ, Wilsdon JBet al., et al. Correlation between spiral computed tomography, endoscopic ultrasonography and findings at operation in pancreatic and ampullary tumours. Br J Surg. 1999;86:189–193.
  262. Rivadeneira DE, Pochapin M, Grobmyer SRet al., et al. Comparison of linear array endoscopic ultrasound and helical computed tomography for the staging of periampullary malignancies. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:890–897.
  263. Rejeski JJ, Kundu S, Hauser Met al., et al. Characteristic endoscopic ultrasound findings of ampullary lesions that predict the need for surgical excision or endoscopic ampullectomy. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016;5:184–188.
  264. Trikudanathan G, Njei B, Attam Ret al., et al. Staging accuracy of ampullary tumors by endoscopic ultrasound: meta-analysis and systematic review. Dig Endosc. 2014;26:617–626.
  265. Itoh A, Goto H, Naitoh Yet al., et al. Intraductal ultrasonography in diagnosing tumor extension of cancer of the papilla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;45:251–260.
  266. Menzel J, Hoepffner N, Sulkowski Uet al., et al. Polypoid tumors of the major duodenal papilla: preoperative staging with intraductal US, EUS, and CT—a prospective, histopathologically controlled study. Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;49:349–357.
  267. Mukai H, Nakajima M, Yasuda Ket al., et al. Evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography in the pre-operative staging of carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater and common bile duct. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38:676–683.
  268. Roberts KJ, McCulloch N, Sutcliffe Ret al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound assessment of lesions of the ampulla of Vater is of particular value in low-grade dysplasia. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15:18–23.
  269. Rosch T, Braig C, Gain Tet al., et al. Staging of pancreatic and ampullary carcinoma by endoscopic ultrasonography. Comparison with conventional sonography, computed tomography, and angiography. Gastroenterology. 1992;102:188–199.
  270. Wee E, Lakhtakia S, Gupta Ret al., et al. The diagnostic accuracy and strength of agreement between endoscopic ultrasound and histopathology in the staging of ampullary tumors. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2012;31:324–332.
  271. Manta R, Conigliaro R, Castellani Det al., et al. Linear endoscopic ultrasonography vs magnetic resonance imaging in ampullary tumors. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:5592–5597.
  272. Napoleon B, Pialat J, Saurin JCet al., et al. Adenomas and adenocarcinomas of the ampulla of Vater: endoscopic therapy. Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2004;28:385–392.
  273. Vogt M, Jakobs R, Benz Cet al., et al. Endoscopic therapy of adenomas of the papilla of Vater. A retrospective analysis with long-term follow-up. Dig Liver Dis. 2000;32:339–345.
  274. Brown KM, Tompkins AJ, Yong Set al., et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy is curative in the majority of patients with node-negative ampullary cancer. Arch Surg. 2005;140:529–532. discussion 532–533.
  275. Ceppa EP, Burbridge RA, Rialon KLet al., et al. Endoscopic versus surgical ampullectomy: an algorithm to treat disease of the ampulla of Vater. Ann Surg. 2013;257:315–322.
  276. Napoleon B, Gincul R, Ponchon Tet al., et al. Endoscopic papillectomy for early ampullary tumors: long-term results from a large multicenter prospective study. Endoscopy. 2014;46:127–134.
  277. Catalano MF, Linder JD, Chak Aet al., et al. Endoscopic management of adenoma of the major duodenal papilla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:225–232.
  278. Desilets DJ, Dy RM, Ku PMet al., et al. Endoscopic management of tumors of the major duodenal papilla: refined techniques to improve outcome and avoid complications. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:202–208.
  279. Ponchon T, Berger F, Chavaillon Aet al., et al. Contribution of endoscopy to diagnosis and treatment of tumors of the ampulla of Vater. Cancer. 1989;64:161–167.
  280. Patel R, Davitte J, Varadarajulu Set al., et al. Endoscopic resection of ampullary adenomas: complications and outcomes. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:3235–3240.
  281. Clary BM, Tyler DS, Dematos Pet al., et al. Local ampullary resection with careful intraoperative frozen section evaluation for presumed benign ampullary neoplasms. Surgery. 2000;127:628–633.
  282. Binmoeller KF, Boaventura S, Ramsperger Ket al., et al. Endoscopic snare excision of benign adenomas of the papilla of Vater. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993;39:127–131.
  283. Norton ID, Gostout CJ, Baron THet al., et al. Safety and outcome of endoscopic snare excision of the major duodenal papilla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56:239–243.
  284. Saurin JC, Chavaillon A, Napoleon Bet al., et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with endoscopic treatment of sporadic adenomas of the papilla of vater. Endoscopy. 2003;35:402–406.
  285. Zadorova Z, Dvofak M, Hajer J. Endoscopic therapy of benign tumors of the papilla of Vater. Endoscopy. 2001;33:345–347.
  286. Cheng CL, Sherman S, Fogel ELet al., et al. Endoscopic snare papillectomy for tumors of the duodenal papillae. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;60:757–764.
  287. Han J, Lee SK, Park DHet al., et al. Treatment outcome after endoscopic papillectomy of tumors of the major duodenal papilla. Korean J Gastroenterol. 2005;46:110–119.
  288. Irani S, Arai A, Ayub Ket al., et al. Papillectomy for ampullary neoplasm: results of a single referral center over a 10-year period. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:923–932.
  289. Jung MK, Cho CM, Park SYet al., et al. Endoscopic resection of ampullary neoplasms: a single-center experience. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2568–2574.
  290. Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras Jet al., et al. Safety and long-term follow-up of endoscopic snare excision of ampullary adenomas. Surg Endosc. 2006;20:608–613.
  291. Martin JA, Haber GB. Ampullary adenoma: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2003;13:649–669.
  292. Moon JH, Cha SW, Cho YDet al., et al. Wire-guided endoscopic snare papillectomy for tumors of the major duodenal papilla. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61:461–466.
  293. Yamao T, Isomoto H, Kohno Set al., et al. Endoscopic snare papillectomy with biliary and pancreatic stent placement for tumors of the major duodenal papilla. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:119–124.
  294. Ma T, Jang EJ, Zukerberg LRet al., et al. Recurrences are common after endoscopic ampullectomy for adenoma in the familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) syndrome. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:2349–2356.
  295. Boix J, Lorenzo-Zuniga V, Moreno de Vega Vet al., et al. Endoscopic resection of ampullary tumors: 12-year review of 21 cases. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:45–49.
Regresar