E-commerce Contacto
/contact

Hawes, Endosonografía 4 edición

Robert H. Hawes


  1. Sección VI: Adquisición de tejido guiada por ultrasonido endoscópico
  2. Cap. 20 Cómo realizar la aspiración con aguja fina guiada por ultrasonido endoscópico
Regresar

Capítulo 20 Cómo realizar la aspiración con aguja fina guiada por ultrasonido endoscópico.

  1. Dumonceau JM, Polkowski M, Larghi Aet al., et al. Indications, results, and clinical impact of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) clinical guideline. Endoscopy. 2011;43:1–16.
  2. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee Anderson MA, Ben-Menachem T, Gan SIet al., et al. Management of antithrombotic agents for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70(6):1060–1070.
  3. Sterlacci W, Sioulas AD, Veits Let al., et al. 22-gauge core vs 22-gauge aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of abdominal masses. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(39):8820–8830.
  4. Schulman AR, Thompson CC, Odze Ret al., et al. Optimizing EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: comprehensive assessment of needle types and tissue acquisition techniques. Gastrointest Endosc. 2017;85(2):419–426.
  5. Lee JK, Lee KT, Choi ERet al., et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48(6):752–757.
  6. Affolter KE, Schmidt RL, Matynia APet al., et al. Needle size has only a limited effect on outcomes in EUS-guided fine needle aspiration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2013;58(4):1026–1034.
  7. Camellini L, Carlinfante G, Azzolini Fet al., et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing 22G and 25G needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid lesions. Endoscopy. 2011;43:709–715.
  8. Fabbri C, Polifemo AM, Luigiano Cet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration with 22- and 25-gauge needles in solid pancreatic masses: a prospective comparative study with randomisation of needle sequence. Dig. Liver Dis. 2011;43:647–652.
  9. Siddiqui UD, Rossi F, Rosenthal LSet al., et al. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1093–1097.
  10. Madhoun MF, Wani SB, Rastogi Aet al., et al. The diagnostic accuracy of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2013;45:86–92.
  11. Yusuf TE, Ho S, Pavey DAet al., et al. Retrospective analysis of the utility of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in pancreatic masses, using a 22-gauge or 25-gauge needle system: a multicenter experience. Endoscopy. 2009;41(5):445–448.
  12. Nguyen TT, Lee CE, Whang CSet al., et al. A Comparison of the diagnostic yield and specimen adequacy between 22 and 25 gauge needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (EUS-FNA) of Solid Pancreatic Lesions (SPL): is bigger better? Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(5):AB100.
  13. Lee JH, Stewart J, Ross WAet al., et al. Blinded prospective comparison of the performance of 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of the pancreas and peri-pancreatic lesions. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54(10):2274–2281.
  14. Paquin SC, Gariepy G, Sahai AV. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of EUS-FNA with and without a stylet: no stylet is better. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(5):AB198.
  15. Rong L, Kida M, Yamauchi Het al., et al. Factors affecting the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for upper gastrointestinal submucosal or extraluminal solid mass lesions. Dig Endosc. 2012;24(5):358–363.
  16. Suzuki R, Irisawa A, Bhutani MSet al., et al. Prospective evaluation of the optimal number of 25-gauge needle passes for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions in the absence of an onsite cytopathologist. Dig Endosc. 2012;24(6):452–456.
  17. Wallace MB, Kennedy T, Durkalski Vet al., et al. Randomized controlled trial of EUS-guided fine needle aspiration techniques for the detection of malignant lymphadenopathy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54(4):441–447.
  18. LeBlanc JK, Ciaccia D, Al-Assi MTet al., et al. Optimal number of EUS-guided fine needle passes needed to obtain a correct diagnosis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59(4):475–481.
  19. Savides TJ. Tricks for improving EUS-FNA accuracy and maximizing cellular yield. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(suppl 2):S130–S133.
  20. Abe Y, Kawakami H, Oba Ket al., et al. Effect of a stylet on a histological specimen in EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using 22-gauge needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;82:837–844.
  21. Rastogi A, Wani S, Gupta Net al., et al. A prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial of EUS-guided FNA with and without a stylet. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:58–64.
  22. Sahai AV, Paquin SC, Gariépy G. A prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration results obtained in the same lesion, with and without the needle stylet. Endoscopy. 2010;42:900–903.
  23. Nijhawan S, Singh B, Kumar Aet al., et al. Randomized controlled trial of comparison of the adequacy, and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration with and without a stylet in Indian patients: a prospective single blind study. J Dig Endosc. 2014;5:149–153.
  24. Wani S, Early D, Kunkel Jet al., et al. Diagnostic yield of malignancy during EUS-guided FNA of solid lesions with and without a stylet: a prospective, single blind, randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76(2):328–335.
  25. Wani S, Gupta N, Gaddam Set al., et al. A comparative study of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration with and without a stylet. Dig Dis Sci. 2011;56:2409–2414.
  26. Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Paquin SC, Gariepy Get al., et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology results with and without the stylet in 3364 cases. Dig Endosc. 2013;25:303–307.
  27. Kim JH, Park SW, Kim MKet al., et al. Meta-analysis for cyto-pathological outcomes in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration with and without the stylet. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61(8):2175–2184.
  28. Puri R, Vilmann P, Săftoiu Aet al., et al. Randomized controlled trial of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle sampling with or without suction for better cytological diagnosis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(4):499–504.
  29. Lee JK, Choi JH, Lee KHet al., et al. A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(5):745–751.
  30. Polkowski M, Larghi A, Weynand Bet al., et al. Learning, techniques, and complications of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling in gastroenterology: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) technical guideline. Endoscopy. 2012;44:190–206.
  31. Kin T, Katanuma A, Yane Ket al., et al. Diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid lesions with conventional 22-gauge needle using the slow pull technique: a prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015;50(7):900–907.
  32. Chen JY, Ding QY, Lv Yet al., et al. Slow-pull and different conventional suction techniques in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions using 22-gauge needles. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(39):8790–8797.
  33. Nakai Y, Isayama H, Chang KJet al., et al. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses. Dig Dis Sci. 2014;59(7):1578–1585.
  34. Katanuma A, Itoi T, Baron THet al., et al. Bench-top testing of suction forces generated through endoscopic ultrasound-guided aspiration needles. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22(5):379–385.
  35. Attam R, Arain MA, Bloechl SJet al., et al. “Wet suction technique (WEST)”: a novel way to enhance the quality of EUS-FNA aspirate. Results of a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial using a 22-gauge needle for EUS-FNA of solid lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1401–1407.
  36. Villa NA, Berzosa M, Wallace MBet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration: the wet suction technique. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016;5(1):17–20.
  37. Varadarajulu S, Fockens P, Hawes RH. Best practices in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10(7):697–703.
  38. Bang JY, Magee SH, Ramesh Jet al., et al. Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Endoscopy. 2013;45(6):445–450.
  39. Wyse JM, Paquin SC, Joseph Let al., et al. EUS-FNA without the stylet: the yield is comparable to that with the stylet and sampling of multiple sites during the same pass may improve sample quality and yield. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(5):AB330–AB331.
  40. Mukai S, Itoi T, Ashida Ret al., et al. Multicenter, prospective, crossover trial comparing the door-knocking method with the conventional method for EUS-FNA of solid pancreatic masses (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;83(6):1210–1217.
  41. ASGE Guideline: Antibiotic Prophylaxis for GI Endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67:791–798.
  42. Hirooka Y, Goto H, Itoh Aet al., et al. Case of intraductal papillary mucinous tumor in which endosonography-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy caused dissemination [letter]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;18:1323–1324.
  43. Shah JN, Fraker D, Guerry D. Melanoma seeding of an EUS-guided fine needle track. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:923–924.
  44. Paquin SC, Gariépy G, Lepanto Let al., et al. A first report of tumor seeding because of EUS-guided FNA of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;61(4):610–611.
  45. Doi S, Yasuda I, Iwashita Tet al., et al. Needle tract implantation on the esophageal wall after EUS-guided FNA of metastatic mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;67(6):988–990.
  46. Chong A, Venugopal K, Segarajasingam Det al., et al. Tumor seeding after EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic tail neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(4):933–935.
  47. Katanuma A, Maguchi H, Hashigo Set al., et al. Tumor seeding after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of cancer in the body of the pancreas. Endoscopy. 2012;44 (suppl 2). UCTN: E160–E161.
  48. Tomonari A, Katanuma A, Matsumori Tet al., et al. Resected tumor seeding in stomach wall due to endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(27):8458–8461.
Regresar