E-commerce Contacto
/contact

Hawes, Endosonografía 4 edición

Robert H. Hawes


  1. Sección VI: Adquisición de tejido guiada por ultrasonido endoscópico
  2. Cap. 21 Técnicas para la biopsia con aguja fina guiada por ultrasonido
Regresar

Capítulo 21 Técnicas para la biopsia con aguja fina guiada por ultrasonido.

  1. Wani S, Muthusamy VR, Komanduri S. EUS-guided tissue acquisition: an evidence-based approach (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:939–959.
  2. Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A, Jhala Net al., et al. Agreement between rapid onsite and final cytologic interpretations of EUS-guided FNA specimens: implications for the endosonographer and patient management. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2841–2847.
  3. Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz JE, Abdulkader Iet al., et al. Influence of on-site cytopathology evaluation on the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) of solid pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:1705–1710.
  4. Hébert-Magee S, Bae S, Varadarajulu Set al., et al. The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis. Cytopathology. 2013;24:159–171.
  5. Matynia AP, Schmidt RL, Barraza Get al., et al. Impact of rapid on-site evaluation on the adequacy of endoscopic-ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:697–705.
  6. Jhala NC, Jhala DN, Chhieng DCet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. A cytopathologist’s perspective. Am J Clin Pathol. 2003;120:351–367.
  7. Kalaitzakis E, Panos M, Sadik Ret al., et al. Clinicians’ attitudes towards endoscopic ultrasound: a survey of four European countries. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44:100–107.
  8. Varadarajulu S, Hawes RH. The changing paradigm in EUS-guided tissue acquisition. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24:1–7.
  9. Braat H, Bruno M, Kuipers EJet al., et al. Pancreatic cancer: promise for personalised medicine? Cancer Lett. 2012;318:1–8.
  10. Brais RJ, Davies SE, O’Donovan Met al., et al. Direct histological processing of EUS biopsies enables rapid molecular biomarker analysis for interventional pancreatic cancer trials. Pancreatology. 2012;12:8–15.
  11. Kim EY. Fine-needle biopsy: should this be the first choice in endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition? Clin Endosc. 2014;47(5):425–428.
  12. Panic N, Larghi A. Techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 2014;24:83–107.
  13. Varadarajulu S, Fraig M, Schmulewitz Net al., et al. Comparison of EUS guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy with EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Endoscopy. 2004;36:397–401.
  14. Shah SM, Ribeiro A, Levi Jet al., et al. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration with and without trucut biopsy of pancreatic masses. JOP. 2008;9:422–430.
  15. Thomas T, Kaye PV, Ragunath Ket al., et al. Efficacy, safety, and predictive factors for a positive yield of EUS-guided trucut biopsy: a large tertiary referral center experience. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:584–591.
  16. DeWitt J, Cho CM, Lin Jet al., et al. Comparison of EUS-guided tissue acquisition using two different 19-gauge core biopsy needles: a multicenter, prospective, randomized, and blinded study. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3:E471–E478.
  17. Iwashita T, Nakai Y, Samarasena JBet al., et al. High single-pass diagnostic yield of a new 25-gauge core biopsy needle for EUS-guided FNA biopsy in solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:909–915.
  18. Attili F, Petrone G, Abdulkader Iet al., et al. Accuracy and inter-observer agreement of the Procore™ 25 gauge needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue core biopsy. Dig Liver Dis. 2015;47:943–949.
  19. Bang JY, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S. A meta-analysis comparing ProCore and standard fine-needle aspiration needles for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition. Endoscopy. 2016;48:339–349.
  20. Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi Aet al., et al. Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:1189–1196.
  21. Iglesias-García J, Abdulkader I, Lariño-Noia J, Domínguez-Muñoz JE. Evaluation of the adequacy and diagnostic accuracy of the histology samples obtained with a newly designed 19-gauge EUS histology needle. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2014;106:6–14.
  22. Itoi T, Itokawa F, Sofuni Aet al., et al. Puncture of solid pancreatic tumors guided by endoscopic ultrasonography: a pilot study series comparing Trucut and 19-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needles. Endoscopy. 2005;37:362–366.
  23. Yasuda I, Tsurumi H, Omar Set al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for lymphadenopathy of unknown origin. Endoscopy. 2006;38:919–924.
  24. Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Doi Set al., et al. The yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for histological diagnosis in patients suspected of stage I sarcoidosis. Endoscopy. 2008;40:400–405.
  25. Larghi A, Verna EC, Ricci Ret al., et al. EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition by using a 19-gauge needle in a selected patient population: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74:504–510.
  26. Larghi A, Capurso G, Carnuccio Aet al., et al. Ki-67 grading of nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors on histologic samples obtained by EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:570–577.
  27. Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Doi Set al., et al. Use of samples from endoscopic ultrasound-guided 19-gauge fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:316–322.
  28. Yasuda I, Goto N, Tsurumi Het al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for diagnosis of lymphoproliferative disorders: feasibility of immunohistological, flow cytometric, and cytogenetic assessments. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012;107:397–404.
  29. Stavropoulos SN, Im GY, Jlayer Zet al., et al. High yield of same-session EUS-guided liver biopsy by 19-gauge FNA needle in patients undergoing EUS to exclude biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75:310–318.
  30. Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S. Assessment of the technical performance of the flexible 19-gauge EUS-FNA needle. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:336–343.
  31. Adler DG, Witt B, Chadwick Bet al., et al. Pathologic evaluation of a new endoscopic ultrasound needle designed to obtain core tissue samples: a pilot study. Endosc Ultrasound. 2016;5:178–183.
  32. Kandel P, Tranesh G, Nassar A, et al. EUS-guided fine needle biopsy sampling using a novel fork-tip needle: a case-control study. Gastrointest Endosc. 84:1034–1039.
  33. DiMaio CJ, Kolb JM, Benias PCet al., et al. Initial experience with a novel EUS-guided core biopsy needle (SharkCore): results of a large North American multicenter study. Endosc Int Open. 2016;4:E974–E979.
  34. Nayar MK, Paranandi B, Dawwas MF, et al. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of 2 core biopsy needles for EUS-guided tissue acquisition from solid pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016. pii: S0016–5107(16)30554-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.048. [Epub ahead of print] PubMed PMID: 27633157.
  35. Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Hasan MKet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biopsy using a Franseen needle design: initial assessment. Dig Endosc. 2017;29:338–346.
  36. Levy MJ, Wiersema MJ. EUS-guided Trucut biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:417–426.
  37. Voss M, Hammel P, Molas Get al., et al. Value of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses. Gut. 2000;46:244–249.
  38. Larghi A, Noffsinger A, Dye CEet al., et al. EUS-guided fine needle tissue acquisition by using high negative pressure suction for the evaluation of solid masses: a pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;62:768–774.
  39. Iglesias-Garcia J, Dominguez-Munoz E, Lozano-Leon Aet al., et al. Impact of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy for diagnosis of pancreatic masses. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:289–293.
  40. Möller K, Papanikolaou IS, Toermer Tet al., et al. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: high yield of 2 passes with combined histologic-cytologic analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:60–69.
  41. Gerke H, Rizk MK, Vanderheyden ADet al., et al. Randomized study comparing endoscopic ultrasound-guided Trucut biopsy and fine needle aspiration with high suction. Cytopathology. 2010;21:44–51.
  42. Noda Y, Fujita N, Kobayashi Get al., et al. Diagnostic efficacy of the cellblock method in comparison with smear cytology of tissue samples obtained by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45:868–875.
  43. Imai K, Matsubayashi H, Fukutomi Aet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy using 22-gauge needle in diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis. Dig Liver Dis. 2011;43:869–874.
  44. Kanno A, Ishida K, Hamada Set al., et al. Diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis by EUS-FNA by using a 22-gauge needle based on the International Consensus Diagnostic Criteria. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:594–602.
  45. Seicean A, Gheorghiu M, Zaharia Tet al., et al. Performance of the standard 22G needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue core biopsy in pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2016;25:213–218.
  46. Larghi A, Fuccio L, Chiarello Get al., et al. Fine-needle tissue acquisition from subepithelial lesions using a forward-viewing linear echoendoscope. Endoscopy. 2014;46:39–45.
  47. Larghi A, Lococo F, Ricci Ret al., et al. Pleural tuberculosis diagnosed by EUS-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;72:1307–1309.
  48. Larghi A, Lugli F, Sharma Vet al., et al. Pancreatic metastases from a bronchopulmonary carcinoid diagnosed by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle tissue acquisition. Pancreas. 2012;41:502–504.
  49. Bang JY, Magee SH, Ramesh Jet al., et al. Randomized trial comparing fanning with standard technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Endoscopy. 2013;45:445–450.
  50. Eckardt AJ, Adler A, Gomes EMet al., et al. Endosonographic large-bore biopsy of gastric subepithelial tumors: a prospective multicenter study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;24:1135–1144.
  51. Diehl DL, Johal AS, Khara HSet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a multicenter experience. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3:E210–E215.
  52. Iwashita T, Yasuda I, Mukai Tet al., et al. Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions: a single-center prospective pilot study (MOSE study). Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:177–185.
  53. Zamboni G, Lüttges J, Capelli Pet al., et al. Histopathological features of diagnostic and clinical relevance in autoimmune pancreatitis: a study on 53 resection specimens and 9 biopsy specimens. Virchows Arch. 2004;445:552–563.
  54. Ricci R, Chiarello G, Attili Fet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle tissue acquisition biopsy samples do not allow a reliable proliferation assessment of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Dig Liver Dis. 2015;47:291–295.
  55. Corless CL, Barnett CM, Heinrich MC. Gastrointestinal stromal tumours: origin and molecular oncology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11:865–878.
  56. Eisenberg BL, Smith KD. Adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for primary GIST. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011;67(Suppl 1):S3–S8.
  57. Larghi A, Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JWet al., et al. Feasibility and yield of a novel 22-gauge histology EUS needle in patients with pancreatic masses: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:3733–3738.
  58. Iwashita T, Nakai Y, Samarasena JBet al., et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy (EUS-FNAB) using a novel 25-gauge core biopsy needle: optimizing the yield of both cytology and histology. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;75. AB183.
  59. Petrone MC, Poley JW, Bonzini Met al., et al. Interobserver agreement among pathologists regarding core tissue specimens obtained with a new endoscopic ultrasound histology needle; a prospective multicentre study in 50 cases. Histopathology. 2013;62:602–608.
  60. Bang JY, Hebert-Magee S, Trevino Jet al., et al. Randomized trial comparing the 22-gauge aspiration and 22-gauge biopsy needles for EUS-guided sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:321–327.
  61. Hucl T, Wee E, Anuradha Set al., et al. Feasibility and efficiency of a new 22G core needle: a prospective comparison study. Endoscopy. 2013;45:792–798.
  62. Witt BL, Adler DG, Hilden Ket al., et al. A comparative needle study: EUS-FNA procedures using the HD ProCore and EchoTip 22-gauge needle types. Diagn Cytopathol. 2013;41:1069–1074.
  63. Vanbiervliet G, Napoléon B, Paul MCSet al., et al. Core needle versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study. Endoscopy. 2014;46:1063–1070.
  64. Kim GH, Cho YK, Kim EYet al., et al. Comparison of 22-gauge aspiration needle with 22-gauge biopsy needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided subepithelial tumor sampling. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2014;49:347–354.
  65. Lee YN, Moon JH, Kim HKet al., et al. Core biopsy needle versus standard aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized parallel-group study. Endoscopy. 2014;46:1056–1062.
  66. Strand DS, Jeffus SK, Sauer BGet al., et al. EUS-guided 22-gauge fine-needle aspiration versus core biopsy needle in the evaluation of solid pancreatic neoplasms. Diagn Cytopathol. 2014;42:751–758.
  67. Berzosa M, Villa N, El-Serag HBet al., et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound guided 22-gauge core needle with standard 25-gauge fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing solid pancreatic lesions. Endosc Ultrasound. 2015;4:28–33.
  68. Mavrogenis G, Weynand B, Sibille Aet al., et al. 25-gauge histology needle versus 22-gauge cytology needle in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided sampling of pancreatic lesions and lymphadenopathy. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3:E63–E68.
  69. Aadam AA, Wani S, Amick Aet al., et al. A randomized controlled cross-over trial and cost analysis comparing endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration and fine needle biopsy. Endosc Int Open. 2016;04:E497–E505.
  70. Sterlacci W, Sioulas AD, Veits Let al., et al. 22-gauge core vs 22-gauge aspiration needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of abdominal masses. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:8820–8830.
  71. Attam R, Arain MA, Bloechl SJet al., et al. “Wet suction technique (WEST)”: a novel way to enhance the quality of EUS-FNA aspirate. Results of a prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial using a 22-gauge needle for EUS-FNA of solid lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81(6):1401–1407.
  72. Rodrigues-Pinto E, Jalaj S, Grimm IS, Baron TH. Impact of EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling with a new core needle on the need for onsite cytopathologic assessment: a preliminary study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2016;84:1040–1046.
Regresar